On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 12:44 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 19:20 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
>
> > Add here probably a "language" for when/if we will have language based
> > sub-planets. It is possible to have multiple values, like
> > language = english, french
> > for the case
Hey guys,
I seem to have deleted the nagios notification that I want to mention in
particular, but as I noted in SOP/Nagios the %ages noted in the e-mails
are what is left, so inode=99% doesn't mean that 99% of the inodes are
used, it means 99% are still free.
Anyway, what this means, is tha
Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 23:55 +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
Anyway, what this means, is that when nagios has been complaining about
cvs-int recently, in particular the fact that /git has reached WARNING.
After a bit of hunting around, I found /repo/pkgs using 168GiB of the
192
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 00:39 +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 23:55 +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> >> Anyway, what this means, is that when nagios has been complaining about
> >> cvs-int recently, in particular the fact that /git has reached WARNING.
> >> Afte
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 23:55 +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> Anyway, what this means, is that when nagios has been complaining about
> cvs-int recently, in particular the fact that /git has reached WARNING.
> After a bit of hunting around, I found /repo/pkgs using 168GiB of the
> 192GiB available, w
Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 00:39 +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 23:55 +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
Anyway, what this means, is that when nagios has been complaining about
cvs-int recently, in particular the fact that /git has reache
Nigel Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Problem here, is that there are a LOT of old tarballs in that folder, which
> leaves me wondering if we should do a spring clean ~1 mo after release.
Until we get something like correspondingsource up and running, we don't
have a good mechanism for weeding
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 08:58 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Nigel Jones wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I seem to have deleted the nagios notification that I want to mention in
> > particular, but as I noted in SOP/Nagios the %ages noted in the e-mails
> > are what is left, so i
On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Nigel Jones wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I seem to have deleted the nagios notification that I want to mention in
> particular, but as I noted in SOP/Nagios the %ages noted in the e-mails
> are what is left, so inode=99% doesn't mean that 99% of the inodes are
> used, it means 99%
I just noticed that fas was having issues and found that fas was using
over a GB of memory on fas2.fedora.phx.redhat.com. No problem, I
restarted fas and expected everything to be fine. 14 minutes later,
memory was over a GB again. Another restart took care of the problem
but I looked at the
10 matches
Mail list logo
