On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Karsten Wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It would be but I get the feeling that some aren't joining or aren't
>> allowed to because of google rules (I have no idea about either of
>> these, someone please correct me)
>
> Well, AIUI Google's whole point of getting
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Mike McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Side note about this, it seems to have broken OpenID support. I've
> reverted to a default configuration so ricky can continue testing. If
> you've got a moment could you hook up with him at some point and find out
> exac
On Mon, 26 May 2008, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
You don't have to limit the choices to "only accept Fedora OpenID
identities" or "allow any OpenID identity". It should be possible to
limit out acceptance of OpenID identities to ones that have previously
been associated with a FAS account. So before
On Mon, 26 May 2008, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
> Just doing some thinking ...
>
> If we want to move our OpenID acceptance outside of Fedora's OpenID
> server, we'll have a blocker with the CLA. AIUI, we need someone to
> knowingly accept the CLA and have that tied to a Real Name and email
> ad
Just doing some thinking ...
If we want to move our OpenID acceptance outside of Fedora's OpenID
server, we'll have a blocker with the CLA. AIUI, we need someone to
knowingly accept the CLA and have that tied to a Real Name and email
address in our database. Right?
However, OpenID could be a go
2008/5/26 Karsten 'quaid' Wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> If we want to move our OpenID acceptance outside of Fedora's OpenID
> server, we'll have a blocker with the CLA. AIUI, we need someone to
> knowingly accept the CLA and have that tied to a Real Name and email
> address in our database. Right
