static F10 Alpha relnotes page

2008-08-04 Thread Karsten 'quaid' Wade
Do we want to turn this page static for the Alpha release? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/10/Alpha/ReleaseNotes I put out the last call for changes and am making a few myself. Is there a good target for calling to static for now? We'll want to make sure we can edit it. Perhaps as part

Re: serverbeach2 and serverbeach3 reboot

2008-08-04 Thread seth vidal
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 02:31 -0400, Ricky Zhou wrote: > serverbeach2 (asterisk1, collab1, ns1) and serverbeach3 (asterisk2, > collab2) mysteriously rebooted ~30 minutes ago. Could it have been a > power problem of some sort? There were no useful entries in > /var/log/messages or anything. If we d

Re: static F10 Alpha relnotes page

2008-08-04 Thread Nigel Jones
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 01:57 -0700, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote: > Do we want to turn this page static for the Alpha release? > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/10/Alpha/ReleaseNotes > > I put out the last call for changes and am making a few myself. Is > there a good target for calling t

Re: serverbeach2 and serverbeach3 reboot

2008-08-04 Thread Ricky Zhou
On 2008-08-04 08:17:50 AM, seth vidal wrote: > yes, it is something worth inquiring about. > > also - it looks like something on the systems was not running properly > b/c they all had a lot of unsendable mail. > > hence all the undelivered mail notices. There was another problem that maybe have

Re: static F10 Alpha relnotes page

2008-08-04 Thread Ricky Zhou
On 2008-08-05 12:57:54 AM, Nigel Jones wrote: > I think this would be a rather interesting experiment and I am sure that > Mediawiki will pass with flying colours :). And well, if it does turn > out we need to use static pages, then it's not that hard to do :). +1 - I think mod_rewriting to static

Re: serverbeach2 and serverbeach3 reboot

2008-08-04 Thread seth vidal
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 14:27 -0400, Ricky Zhou wrote: > On 2008-08-04 08:17:50 AM, seth vidal wrote: > > yes, it is something worth inquiring about. > > > > also - it looks like something on the systems was not running properly > > b/c they all had a lot of unsendable mail. > > > > hence all the u

Re: serverbeach2 and serverbeach3 reboot

2008-08-04 Thread Ricky Zhou
On 2008-08-04 02:27:19 PM, seth vidal wrote: > /me shudders > root? seriously? Let's go ahead and validate all the other names we > don't like the idea of: > > 1. pretty much any daemon username in any pkg in fedora > 2. all numerics > 3. all of the base system usernames The current blacklist is i