On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:07:41 -0400
Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second, Fedora Applications/Amber is eventually going to need an
actual production server ready around the Fedora 10 release date.
I'd like to get to the point where I can make a formal request for
aforementioned
Apologies for this being an idea with no code attached. I'm hoping that
some of the able folks are on this list and will see something
achievable.
Something the Community Architecture folks and I have discovered is that
when we sign up new folks for an account, there's not any way to mark
them
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 15:52 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Apologies for this being an idea with no code attached. I'm hoping that
some of the able folks are on this list and will see something
achievable.
Something the Community Architecture
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:33:32PM +, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Apologies for this being an idea with no code attached. I'm hoping that
some of the able folks are on this list and will see something
achievable.
Something the Community Architecture folks and I have discovered is that
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 13:23 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:07:41 -0400
Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second, Fedora Applications/Amber is eventually going to need an
actual production server ready around the
On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote:
Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or something
like that, hopefully I'll be back later today/tomorrow to help if
needed.
If it requires auth, we'll probably want it at admin.fedoraproject.org
so that it can share cookies
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote:
Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or something
like that, hopefully I'll be back later today/tomorrow to help if
needed.
If it requires auth, we'll probably want it at
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Paul W. Frields wrote:
--- Snips some cleanup ---
We could create FAS groups for regions, sure. But there's also
particular ambassadors to consider -- for example, an Ambassador who
works on Websites might target a new signup for helping with Websites,
even though that
On 2008-08-12 08:09:20 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
it is probably time to better describe what goes where and why. I'm fond
of the admin.fedoraproject.org/blah/ for stuff. But if this is an
application that end users will be using that doesn't seem quite right.
Hmm, I wonder if this could lead
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:09:20 -0500 (CDT)
Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote:
Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or
something like that, hopefully I'll be back later
10 matches
Mail list logo
