2008/8/24 Dennis Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> That shouldnt work with the Makefiles. since they all use
> cvs.fedoraproject.org not the old legacy address :)
s/cvs.fedora.redhat.com/cvs.fedoraproject.org/ in the above then :)
I've never had any issues Though, I _really_ ought to update my
On Sunday 24 August 2008 04:16:33 pm Chris Weyl wrote:
> 2008/8/24 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm keeping only a partial checkout of the packages, e.g. the ones I'm
> > maintaining. Now I'd like to be able to cvs up and have all updates
> > flow in, but if I do so cvs will want
2008/8/24 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I'm keeping only a partial checkout of the packages, e.g. the ones I'm
> maintaining. Now I'd like to be able to cvs up and have all updates
> flow in, but if I do so cvs will want to get all other thousand
> packages in.
>
> Until now I'm using a
Hey all --
I know this is probably last thing from a priority perspective right
now, but I'd been using the stylesheets at:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/css/layout.css
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/css/content.css
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/css/docbook.css
Any idea when they'll be back on
Axel Thimm wrote:
Hi,
I'm keeping only a partial checkout of the packages, e.g. the ones I'm
maintaining. Now I'd like to be able to cvs up and have all updates
flow in, but if I do so cvs will want to get all other thousand
packages in.
Until now I'm using a poor man's solution with a for loop
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 07:44:39PM +0300, Axel Thimm wrote:
> I'm keeping only a partial checkout of the packages, e.g. the ones I'm
> maintaining. Now I'd like to be able to cvs up and have all updates
> flow in, but if I do so cvs will want to get all other thousand
> packages in.
>
> Until
Hi,
I'm keeping only a partial checkout of the packages, e.g. the ones I'm
maintaining. Now I'd like to be able to cvs up and have all updates
flow in, but if I do so cvs will want to get all other thousand
packages in.
Until now I'm using a poor man's solution with a for loop and
pushd/popd, but
2008/8/24 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 09:34:36AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> >> >* ssh_key: Error - Not a valid RSA SSH key: ssh-dss ...
>> >> >
>> >> > Have DSA keys now been banned?
>> >>
>> >> Yes.
>> >>
>> >> > Why?
>> >>
>> >> The primary reason is t
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 09:39:15AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> 2008/8/24 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:37:13PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> >> > The primary reason is that it's nearly impossible to tell if the key
> >> > was generated on a Debian system w
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 09:34:36AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >> >* ssh_key: Error - Not a valid RSA SSH key: ssh-dss ...
> >> >
> >> > Have DSA keys now been banned?
> >>
> >> Yes.
> >>
> >> > Why?
> >>
> >> The primary reason is that it's nearly impossible to tell if the key
> >> wa
2008/8/24 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:37:13PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>> > The primary reason is that it's nearly impossible to tell if the key
>> > was generated on a Debian system with the compromised OpenSSL
>> > versions.
>
> OK, I checked and it is far fro
2008/8/24 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:37:13PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>> 2008/8/23 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:06:07PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>> >> 2008/8/23 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >> >
>> >> > I saw that some
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 10:21 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> This whole team got a well-deserved attaboy from Tim Burke, who is the
> Director of Linux Development inside Red Hat.
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-August/msg01023.html
>
> '''
> Dear Fedorans,
>
> There's
This whole team got a well-deserved attaboy from Tim Burke, who is the
Director of Linux Development inside Red Hat.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-August/msg01023.html
'''
Dear Fedorans,
There's an old expression: When the going gets tough; the tough get going.
The har
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:37:13PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> > The primary reason is that it's nearly impossible to tell if the key
> > was generated on a Debian system with the compromised OpenSSL
> > versions.
OK, I checked and it is far from impossible. After all the bug was
that there ar
On Sat August 23 2008, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> 2008/8/23 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Have DSA keys now been banned?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Why?
>
> The primary reason is that it's nearly impossible to tell if the key
> was generated on a Debian system with the compromised OpenSSL
This is also true
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:37:13PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> 2008/8/23 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:06:07PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> >> 2008/8/23 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> >
> >> > I saw that some people are using CVS again, so I tried as well,
17 matches
Mail list logo
