Outage Notification - 2008-12-16 08:10 UTC
There has been an unplanned outage beginning at 2008-12-16 08:10 UTC.
There is currently no ETA for resolving these issues.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-M
I've been talking with some of the SuSE guys and we agree there's some
overlap or at least coordination between their buildsystem and ours. The
first obvious low hanging fruit is common macros. For those who wonder
"why would we help OpenSuSE?" the answer is common goals, and better user
experie
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Mike McGrath wrote:
> I've been talking with some of the SuSE guys and we agree there's some
> overlap or at least coordination between their buildsystem and ours. The
> first obvious low hanging fruit is common macros. For those who wonder
> "why would we help OpenSuSE?" t
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Andreas Thienemann wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> > I've been talking with some of the SuSE guys and we agree there's some
> > overlap or at least coordination between their buildsystem and ours. The
> > first obvious low hanging fruit is common macros.
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> Outage Notification - 2008-12-16 08:10 UTC
>
> There has been an unplanned outage beginning at 2008-12-16 08:10 UTC.
> There is currently no ETA for resolving these issues.
>
> Ticket Link:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1059
>
M
With the arrival of this message, I've left the following groups in the
Fedora Account System:
extras_signers
sysadmin
Thanks to Warren Togami and Seth Vidal for the trust in me that lead to
the initial group membership.
pgpZ1eW12wLpV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 10:48:48 am Mike McGrath wrote:
> I've been talking with some of the SuSE guys and we agree there's some
> overlap or at least coordination between their buildsystem and ours. The
> first obvious low hanging fruit is common macros. For those who wonder
> "why would we
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:48:48AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> I've been talking with some of the SuSE guys and we agree there's some
> overlap or at least coordination between their buildsystem and ours. The
> first obvious low hanging fruit is common macros. For those who wonder
> "why would w
On Tue December 16 2008, Mike McGrath wrote:
> The problem is time and coordination. So on a whim I thought I'd send
> this email out. Do we have any contributors out there who are both
> members of Fedora and SuSE who would be willing to lead this charge, find
> similarities and places for coor
Hi All,
Just FYI, noc1 moved from xen2 to xen5 today which frees up xen1 and
xen2 to be dedicated for releng :)
- Nigel
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-inf
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 07:27:08 pm Nigel Jones wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Just FYI, noc1 moved from xen2 to xen5 today which frees up xen1 and
> xen2 to be dedicated for releng :)
you mean releng/buildsys right?
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
__
Err yes, I kinda class them interchangeable though...
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 19:51 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 December 2008 07:27:08 pm Nigel Jones wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Just FYI, noc1 moved from xen2 to xen5 today which frees up xen1 and
> > xen2 to be dedicated for releng :)
12 matches
Mail list logo
