On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'd like the following patch to be applied. It fixes the redirects for
> RPM-GPG-KEY files for secondary arches not to be redirected to
> /pub/fedora-secondary/, so that Jigdo's can find the files.
>
+1
--
Xavier.t Lamien
--
h
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 01:58:28PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 12:21 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > This was certainly unexpected, and repairing this is going to be...
> > interesting.
> >
>
> Through some fun work with /sbin/hardlink I got a lot of the packages
> fixed
Hi,
It´s almost one year, I am with the Fedora community. In this one year, I
met so many great people from Fedora community. I have visited hundreds of
forums, mailing lists. I meet so many people who uses Fedora (also who
doesn´t). I have learned so many things from them. Some of them are happy
Dear Sir, Thanks for giving me a chance to contribute fedora.I'm Sending Here My Self Information.Suresh Shinde ===ADDRESS===Shinde Farm,Near The Veterinary Dispensary,A/P - Karkamb,Tal - Pandharpur,Di
Thanks. Ok. I am forwarding it there.
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Jonathan Roberts
wrote:
> 2009/2/1 Ashiqur Rahman Angel :
> > Hi,
> >
> > It´s almost one year, I am with the Fedora community. In this one year, I
> > met so many great people from Fedora community. I have visited hundreds
> o
Dear Sir, Thanks for giving me a chance to contribute fedora.I'm Sending Here My Self Information.Suresh Shinde ===ADDRESS===Shinde Farm,Near The Veterinary Dispensary,A/P - Karkamb,Tal - Pandharpur,Di
According to Fedora Devel List, I have got some hope about this issues I
have explained. May be soon we will get all the solutions. If not in this
release (Fedora 11), then may be in Fedora 12.
Thanks.
2009/2/1 Kanin Horvath
> The goal of fedora isn't to make it super easy for new users to Lin
> 4. Need a complete GUI solution to install softwares offline from cache
> (ofcourse if it can fix the dependency) or DVD Media.
PackageKit has it: http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/10/09/service-pack-gui/
Cheerio,
Debarshi
___
Fedora-infrastructure
2009/2/1 Kanin Horvath
> The goal of fedora isn't to make it super easy for new users to Linux.
>
>
That's ubuntu's job.
>
Whats wrong with "super easy" Operating System if it include all security
capabilities?
To whom you are developing this?
Is this for geeks? or for every one (including new
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Xavier Lamien wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen
> wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > I'd like the following patch to be applied. It fixes the redirects for
> > RPM-GPG-KEY files for secondary arches not to be redirected to
> > /pub/fedora-secondary/, so that Ji
On 2009-02-01 07:27:10 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> -RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/pub/fedora/linux/.*ia64.* [OR]
> -RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/pub/fedora/linux/.*sparc.*
> +RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/pub/fedora/linux/.*[/]+ia64.* [OR]
> +RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/pub/fedora/linux/.*[/]+sp
Exactly, what I wanted to say.
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Joseph Smidt wrote:
> I think we are attacking the wrong goal. What people want is
> that their OS "Just Works".
>
> What Fedora really needs to do is find a legal way to make all of
> these things "Just Work". As long as
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 10:16 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> Isn't there a backup of /releases/ to pull back the original files?
I do believe there is, but it would involve tape and a long wait, for
something as easy to fix as timestamps. I have most of them fixed,
there are only a tiny few that are n
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Frank Chiulli wrote:
>
> I'm not running samba. If I put the following rule before the LOG
> rule, will the packets be dropped and the messages stopped?
>
> -A INPUT -p udp -s 192.168.0.0/24 -d 192.168.0.0/24 -m multiport
> --ports 137,138 -j DROP
>
I normally
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Frank Chiulli
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm not running samba. If I put the following rule before the LOG
>> rule, will the packets be dropped and the messages stopped?
>>
>> -A INPUT -p udp -s 192.168.0.0/2
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Frank Chiulli wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Frank Chiulli
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I'm not running samba. If I put the following rule before the LOG
>>> rule, will the packets be dropped
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Frank Chiulli wrote:
>
> Feb 1 09:03:46 localhost kernel: FW-REJECT IN=eth0 OUT=
> MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:21:47:b7:86:61:08:00 SRC=0.0.0.0
> DST=255.255.255.255 LEN=328 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=40094
> PROTO=UDP SPT=68 DPT=67 LEN=308
>
> I was curious what it
I added some code just after FUDCon to generate a fullfilelist at the
top of /pub/fedora/. I made an error in this leading to lots of /tmp/
files.
Subject: [PATCH] Fix an alias assignment.
This was causing /tmp/ to fill up with lots of tmpfiles of no use.
Also, use a more modern syntax.
---
con
+1
- Nigel
- "Jesse Keating" wrote:
> I added some code just after FUDCon to generate a fullfilelist at the
> top of /pub/fedora/. I made an error in this leading to lots of
> /tmp/
> files.
>
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix an alias assignment.
>
> This was causing /tmp/ to fill up with lots of t
Nirik noticed the wiki behaving slow. After some investigation I noticed
telia1 had a ro filesystem. Anyway, a reboot later and she's dead jim.
I've created a ticket with proio (they provide our remote hands in telia
for free, we are happy to have them as a Fedora sponsor :)
Anywho, I'll let you
On 2009-02-01 04:34:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> I added some code just after FUDCon to generate a fullfilelist at the
> top of /pub/fedora/. I made an error in this leading to lots of /tmp/
> files.
+1
Thanks,
Ricky
pgpN93y0d6sBG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
For your consideration.
Forwarded Message
From: Carlos Vassalo (opossum1er)
To: webmas...@fedoraproject.org
Subject: Can you help me please?
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:55:25 +0100
Hi,
I have a big problem.
I remove all the content of my personnal directory "opossum1er" on
fedo
There are some features I'd really like to make use of in 0.11,
particularly the metrics feature, but I think there are others as well.
Trac 0.11 is where all the development seems to be happening, we'll
slowly fall farther and farther behind.
There is a catch with 0.11, in that it requires an ond
On 2009-02-01 11:04:04 PM, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> For your consideration.
>
> Forwarded Message
> From: Carlos Vassalo (opossum1er)
> To: webmas...@fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Can you help me please?
> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:55:25 +0100
>
> I remove all the content
24 matches
Mail list logo
