Can we make this page read-only now that FUDConF10 is over?
- Forwarded message from WikiAdmin -
From: WikiAdmin
To: Cra
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 13:09:13 + (UTC)
Subject: FedoraProject page FUDCon:FUDConF10 has been changed by anonymous user
189.73.88.220
Reply-To: fedorawiki-nore.
All,
I was looking at some of the requested enhancements and I ran into
ticket #208 (https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/208)
regarding a KB for Fedora.
I've been looking around for alternatives and I ran into phpMyFAQ
(www.phpmyfaq.de/). I installed it on a VM I had and it appe
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:46:20PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > I'm all for pruning, lets have a plan for it though. Anyone see any
> > reason not to have these up there?
> >
> > Should we come up with some test for what does and does not get removed?
>
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Mike McGrath wrote:
releases) get to stay.
We haven't traditionally hosted spins elsewhere, such as archive.fp.o
or alt.fp.o, so nuking them removes the only method by which someone
could obtain them. Given we're OK on space right now, there's no good
reason to remove spi
