On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:46:05PM -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Seeing as it is a mirroring daemon, the network is the bottleneck. If it
isn't
then either you're sitting next door, our implementation is bad, or the
hardware shouldn't be a mirror in the first place.
Speaking from experience,
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:46:05PM -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Seeing as it is a mirroring daemon, the network is the bottleneck. If it
isn't
then either you're sitting next door, our implementation is bad, or the
hardware shouldn't be a mirror
Since the last mass update, we have had RHEL-5.4 and a bunch of
security updates come out... so its time to do another mass update
before the Fedora-12 freeze.
Here is an updated list of systems and in the order they should be
updated. Due to updates in xen we should update the xen servers also.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mike McGrath wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:46:05PM -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Seeing as it is a mirroring daemon, the network is the bottleneck. If it
isn't
then either you're sitting next
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:46:05PM -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Seeing as it is a mirroring daemon, the network is the bottleneck. If it
isn't
then either you're sitting next door, our implementation is bad, or the
Hello guys,
I am Abiel Mogos, new to the Fedora infrastructure-list and looking
forward to contribute to the Fedora Project. I am a student in
Fairfield (GMT-5), Iowa, studying Masters in computer science.
Though its not consistent, I have used Fedora Core for about 4 years.
I have worked on a
