Re: temporary rsync files visible on download-i2

2009-11-20 Thread Adrian Reber
I saw it during the initial F12 sync and it has been there since. Adrian On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 06:46:48PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: Are you seeing this regularly or just this one time? -Mike On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Adrian Reber wrote: The configuration of

Introduction New subscriber - Contributor

2009-11-20 Thread Rene Purcell
Hi all, My name is René Jr Purcell and I'd like to join the Fedora community and I think the Infrastructure group is a good place to start! I started using Linux with Slackware 4.0, I remember all those night trying to understand this new way of thinking and using computer I had a lot of fun and

DNSSEC and Geodns

2009-11-20 Thread Mike McGrath
Nothing's ever easy, is it? So I got pdns up and going this afternoon with it's geo back end. It's working as expected and everything is good. The problem is pdns's dnssec implementation is... not particularly mature or really even usable AFAIK with geodns. Anyone out there doing both geo

Re: DNSSEC and Geodns

2009-11-20 Thread Mike McGrath
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: Nothing's ever easy, is it? So I got pdns up and going this afternoon with it's geo back end.  It's working as expected and everything is good.  The problem is pdns's

Re: DNSSEC and Geodns

2009-11-20 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: Nothing's ever easy, is it? So I got pdns up and going this afternoon with it's geo back end.  

Re: DNSSEC and Geodns

2009-11-20 Thread Nigel Jones
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: Nothing's ever

Re: DNSSEC and Geodns

2009-11-20 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: Nothing's ever easy, is it? So I got pdns up and going this afternoon with it's geo back end.  It's working as expected and everything is good.  The problem is pdns's dnssec implementation is...  not particularly mature

Re: DNSSEC and Geodns

2009-11-20 Thread Mike McGrath
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: Nothing's ever easy, is it? So I got

Re: DNSSEC and Geodns

2009-11-20 Thread Mike McGrath
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Mike McGrath wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com

Re: DNSSEC and Geodns

2009-11-20 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Mike McGrath

Re: DNSSEC and Geodns

2009-11-20 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: So, for example 'fedoraproject.org' wouldn't be signed, but 'us.fedoraproject.org' would be?  I *think* that's possible but I haven't gotten it to work.  If I can get that to work though I guess that makes sense because

Re: DNSSEC and Geodns

2009-11-20 Thread Mike McGrath
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: So, for example 'fedoraproject.org' wouldn't be signed, but 'us.fedoraproject.org' would be?  I *think* that's possible but I haven't gotten it to work.  If I can get that

Re: DNSSEC and Geodns

2009-11-20 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: So, for example 'fedoraproject.org' wouldn't be signed, but 'us.fedoraproject.org' would be?  I

Re: DNSSEC and Geodns

2009-11-20 Thread Mike McGrath
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: So, for example 'fedoraproject.org' wouldn't be

Re: DNSSEC and Geodns

2009-11-20 Thread Nigel Jones
At the moment? Nothing. On 21/11/2009, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Mike McGrath

Re: DNSSEC and Geodns

2009-11-20 Thread Nigel Jones
Actually it does buy us some trust but as the roots aren't signed it's fairly moot. On 21/11/2009, Nigel Jones d...@nigelj.com wrote: At the moment? Nothing. On 21/11/2009, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:30 PM,