Re: Nagios and notification

2007-07-02 Thread Daniel Drown
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007, Mike McGrath wrote: > I'm moving our production nagios install onto its own machine with cacti > (noc1) We've had a few false positives because lockbox is just too busy > with other things. In the process of this move I was wondering how we > should do nagios notifications

Re: Moin 1.6 beta.

2007-12-26 Thread Daniel Drown
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > I'm for it. > > I handed off my patch to MrBawb but we knew we'd have to maintain a > version of the patch against 1.5.x for our use and one against > upstream's development branch. Having our patch apply to something more > recent can only help that

Re: Puppet help - group membership on specific host

2008-08-26 Thread Daniel Drown
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Jesse Keating wrote: > I need a puppet trick. We have a shared user, masher, that has write > access to the mash/ directory on the koji store (but not the packages!). > This user currently exists on nfs1 and releng2. On releng2 the user is > used to run the rawhide creation c

Re: staging environment discussion

2008-09-05 Thread Daniel Drown
On Fri, 05 Sep 2008, Mike McGrath wrote: > So as many of you have seen in the commits lists, the staging environment > is coming along and getting built. I've hit a policy issue and so I > thought instead of just doing this in a black hole. I'd discuss it. > > The way I see it there are two ways

Re: fp.o content via IPv6

2009-09-09 Thread Daniel Drown
On Tue, 08 Sep 2009, Allen Kistler wrote: > In case other 6to4 clients can't figure out why fp.o is beyond their > reach over IPv6, here's some fixing I did to make access to fp.o over > 6to4 work for me. > > I hadn't had a problem with hanging connections to other IPv6 sites, but > I have for fp.

Re: fp.o content via IPv6

2009-09-09 Thread Daniel Drown
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009, Mike McGrath wrote: > ipv6 has caused a lot of problems for certain people, very non-obvious, > takes several hours to fix problems. I wonder if there's anything more we > can do on our end. One not-very-elegent change that could be made on the webservers is to limit their ma

Re: fp.o content via IPv6

2009-09-09 Thread Daniel Drown
[I apologize for sending so many messages on this topic, this probably belongs on a different mailing list] > 1. the packet too big ICMP message should be coming from your tunnel box I talked this over with a friend who knows more about networking, and he pointed out that I had this point backwar