On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 22:02 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> I'm ready to deploy the configs with puppet. Should we continue to use
> CVS, upgrade to SVN or try to use something like hg (even though a
> distributed SCM would have more negatives than positives IMHO for our
> infrastructure.
>
> /me
On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 20:36 -0700, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
>
> On Mar 11, 2007, at 8:19 PM, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
>
> > One thing that has really bothered me lately about SVN is the lack of
> > merge tracking.
>
> It's coming -- either in 1.5 or 1.6.
>
>
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 12:47 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
>
> At this point, I'm looking for volunteers to try out the site, enter
> their data, and let me know if something causes a python backtrace and
> what you did to get there. My goal is to shake enough bugs out that
> it can be used *LIVE* for
I've started working on internationalization for Smolt. It's not ready
to commit to the main smolt repository, as it's not complete and I'm
sure I've committed some boneheaded mistakes because I've never done any
internationalizing of code before. I've set up a separate Mercurial
repository here.
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 15:55 -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
> One Time Changes
>
> 1) Existing cla_done is cloned to fedora_cla.
> 2) dell_cla group is created, Matt adds whoever he wants. Remove
> dell_cla members from fedora_cla.
> 3) redhat_cla group is created, populated through
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 10:44 -0700, Margaret Lum wrote:
> >
> > Project Info
> > Project Name: Certificate System
> > Target Audience: folks interested in Open Source PKI software
> > Expiration Date (required): indefinite
> > Description/Summary: This project is an enterprise-class Open Sour
With F8T1 fast approaching (it's currently scheduled to be released on 1
August 2007) we need to get cracking on a new VCS system. I've been
working on converting the CVS repositories to GIT on some spare hardware
that I've had laying around. I think that it's at a stage where input &
testing fro
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 10:44 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 10:31 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 09:17 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > I'm glad this is started back up. One thing that amuses me is back
> > > before the F7 launch it almost seemed assured tha
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 13:50 -0400, Christopher Blizzard wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 10:31 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> >
> > Right. I really don't think we want to just take our current system,
> > switch out CVS, and end up with all of the same workflows. The change
> > should be more about h
[15:06] mmcgrath has set the subject to fedora-infrastructure meeting -- Who's
here?
[15:06] xDamox: Me
[15:06] mmcgrath: PING ALL: who's here?
[15:06] G: I'm here
[15:06] mbonnet: yo
[15:06] cemc has joined the group chat ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
[15:06] G: I'm gonna have to disappear in 15-20
[15:06
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 14:08 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> > I would like to add a +1 on this.
> >
> > Listen I realize that having flash will enhance how it is perceived
> > and will allow more editorial control on layout. However, it would
> > see
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 21:04 +0200, Paulo Santos wrote:
> +1 on the cleanup
>
> Regarding, changing the actually SCM, do we need anything that CVS
> doesnt offer ?
> If we do, then lets discuss options, if we dont, then let's stick with
> it.
Other than the fact that CVS sucks? Git would be my pr
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 00:37 -0500, David Douthitt wrote:
> Anand Capur wrote:
> > It has the pros/cons of CVS, Subversion, Mercurial, Bazaar-ng, and
> > git, also what we need in a system.
> I vote for Subversion - just from the standpoint that many people will
> know how to use it, and supporting
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 16:01 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 June 2007 11:32:54 Mike McGrath wrote:
> > 1) Modular ACL
> > 2) email notification
> > 3) Tagging
> > 4) Anonymous read/check outs
> >
> >
> > Can anyone think of anything else?
>
> I'd really like there to be offline support
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 21:20 -0400, Christopher Blizzard wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 16:06 -0400, Michael DeHaan wrote:
> >
> > However it does rely on the accessibility of those upstream repos.
> > Shouldn't be a major issue. If it's down, no updates.
>
> Trust me when I say you don't wan
[15:01] mmcgrath has set the subject to Fedora Infrastructure -- Who's here?
[15:01] mmcgrath: Alrighty everyone. Who's here?
[15:01] * abadger1999 is here
[15:01] * skvidal is here
[15:01] * xDamox is here
[15:01] abadger1999 has left ( ([EMAIL PROTECTED]))
[15:01] abadger1999 has joined the grou
[15:01] mmcgrath has set the subject to Fedora Infrastructure -- Who's here
[15:01] mmcgrath: ping all, who's here?
[15:01] * skvidal is here
[15:02] * xDamox is here
[15:02] * Bob-Laptop is not here but does not really count yet
[15:02] mmcgrath: paulobanon, dgilmore, mbonnet__, mbonnet, abadger19
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 09:13 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> git:
+1
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman
[15:04] mmcgrath has set the subject to Fedora Infrastructure -- Who's here?
[15:04] * abadger1999 stops coding for a minute and prepares for a meeting
[15:04] * xDamox is ehre
[15:04] fchiulli: frank is here
[15:05] jcollie: hello...
[15:05] f13: I'm somewhat here
[15:05] mmcgrath: we'll be follow
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 21:25 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> I've moved all of the schedule items off to the ticket system. If you'd
> like to discuss your ticket in the meeting add the word "meeting" to the
> keywords section of your ticket. The schedule from now on will be more
> about some of t
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 22:04 -0500, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 21:25 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > I've moved all of the schedule items off to the ticket system. If you'd
> > like to discuss your ticket in the meeting add the word "meeting&qu
[15:06] mmcgrath has set the subject to Fedora Infrastructue -- Who's here
[15:07] mmcgrath: f13: paulobanon abadger1999 mbonnet quaid warren lmacken
ricky xDamox skvidal: ping
[15:07] mmcgrath: who's here?
[15:07] skvidal: pong
[15:07] xDamox: pong
[15:07] mbonnet: mmcgrath: yo
[15:07] abadger19
[15:04] mmcgrath has set the subject to Fedora Infrastructure -- Role ca
[15:04] mmcgrath: Who's here?
[15:04] * skvidal is
[15:04] jcollie: i am
[15:04] * lmacken
[15:04] jeremy has left (Remote closed the connection ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]/redhat/x-2faba177d7c1624f))
[15:04] warren has left (Remote
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 18:15 -0700, David Lutterkort wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 16:01 -0500, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
> > [15:30] mmcgrath: the problem is opening up access but still keeping some
> > of the passwords/keys secure.
> > [15:30] mmcgrath: like the web guys don
Testing has been going well, and people seem to like/want/need the
service so I thought that we should nail down what features we want in
the "Fedora Project PBX 1.0". Here's a list based on what I'd like to
see and what I've gathered from IRC/email/voice conferences.
1) Permanent voice conferenc
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 03:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Mike McGrath wrote:
> > Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >>
> >> Crazy idea:
> >>
> >> Voice support for end users by other end users.
> >
> > I'm not going to say no to this, but I am going to say that if this is a
> > service we are serious abou
[15:02] mmcgrath has set the subject to Infrastructure -- Role call
[15:02] mmcgrath: Who's here?
[15:02] * lmacken
[15:02] jeremy has left (Remote closed the connection ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]/redhat/x-85aceb302d31e828))
[15:02] warren has left (Remote closed the connection ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]/wombat
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 14:54 -0500, Michael Stahnke wrote:
> Beacuse this is my favorite thread everor my Monday just isn't
> going that well
>
> http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/watertower.jpg -- it's the official
> water tower used in the movie. (My GIMP skills suck)
Here's a slightly be
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 15:14 -0500, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 14:54 -0500, Michael Stahnke wrote:
> > Beacuse this is my favorite thread everor my Monday just isn't
> > going that well
> >
> > http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/wat
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 10:57 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > Just saw this, figured someone here might be interested.
> >
> > http://www.fusionio.com/
>
> $30/GB. That's gonna hurt.
It depends... If your application needs to be really fast but
Apologies for dropping off the radar for the past few weeks, but things
at work got busier rather than slacking off after the semester started
(I got assigned several new high-priority projects - such is life when
working in an understaffed IT shop) and I vastly underestimated how busy
things would
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 11:22 +0200, Mirko Klinner wrote:
> Hi friends of good infrastructure,
>
> 2007/10/23, Mike McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ok, so there's a ticket for a new news site,
>
> https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/178
>
>
32 matches
Mail list logo
