Jim Meyering wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
>> Send a patch?
...
>>From f044206b3d6d2c43c6ea5c16728841a9584e374c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jim Meyering
> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:35:35 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] configs/build/rawhide: stop upon failure
>
>
Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 23:20 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Sure.
>> What repo?
>> I have a couple fedora-infra-related ones,
>> but none that contain that file, and a few quick
>> searches didn't show me the light.
>
> Oh, it'
Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 21:10 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> It'd be good to change the other semicolons to " &&", too.
>> Otherwise, failing mktemp will not stop the script, and
>> the git clone will run in $HOME.
>
> Send
Jesse Keating wrote:
...
> diff --git a/configs/build/rawhide b/configs/build/rawhide
...
> +15 6 * * * masher TMPDIR=`mktemp -d /tmp/rawhide.XX` && cd $TMPDIR; git
> clone -n git://git.fedorahosted.org/git/releng; cd releng; git checkout -b
> rawhide-stable; LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ./scripts/buildr
Jesse Keating wrote:
> Moving to F12 content has caused the rawhide compose to take
> longer than one day, mostly to create all the new delta rpms.
> This disables the attempt to build rawhide so that we don't have
> two composes happening at once.
..
> diff --git a/configs/build/rawhide b/configs/
Damian Myerscough wrote:
> I have just done some research on SSH and S/Key and I read that S/Key
> cannot withstand a brute forced attack [1]
>
> [1] http://www.gentoo-wiki.info/OpenSSH_skey
OTPW looks better:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OTPW
___
Fe
Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Damian Myerscough wrote:
>> What about the use of S/Key (one-time passwords) I think it is possible to
>> deploy SSH with S/Key authentication. I haven't look into it that much but it
>> could be a possible solution?
>
> If someone had my username, passwor
Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Mike McGrath wrote:
>> > I just don't like the precident of "I want to do X with my project and you
>> > don't support it, let me log in and do it myself." I'm also trying
Mike McGrath wrote:
> I just don't like the precident of "I want to do X with my project and you
> don't support it, let me log in and do it myself." I'm also trying to
> make sure the pros of this outweigh the cons.
I'm convinced that this would be generally useful. The proof is easy
to see whe
Mike McGrath wrote:
> So are you two working on a svn mirroring solution for Fedora Hosted svn
> projects? Or just a couple of one offs for your own hosted repos?
Is there interest in a general solution?
Resources?
I believe in doing things "right", so tend to prefer
tools general enough to be r
I've been lurking here for some time, and have seen
some recent opportunities to help make a difference,
so have just applied for membership to the sysadmin group.
For example, Fabio Di Nitto and I would like to set up
an svn-to-git mirror for a project on fedorahosted.
While I set up and maintain
Toshio Kuratomi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>> When I do serious work against an upstream CVS repository, I arrange to
>> mirror the CVS repo to git, and do all of my work in git, committing
>> changes on private git branches. Then, I can easily rebase each of
>> those branches (sort of like cv
Toshio Kuratomi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
...
>> I consider the automated cvs-to-git mirroring to be the first step
>> in any conversion proposal:
>>
>> First, give people an idea of what they can expect in a git-based dVCS,
>> withou
seth vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 17:25 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
>> At 5GB+, (4.5GB for a copy of the cvs repo + 700MB for git) that's too
>> heavy for me. And besides, it'd really be better under the Fedora
>> umbrella. S
Mike McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
...
>> At 5GB+, (4.5GB for a copy of the cvs repo + 700MB for git) that's too
>> heavy for me. And besides, it'd really be better under the Fedora
>> umbrella. Seeing as how much more efficient th
Mike McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Mike McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> tried this, its not an easy task. But adding an additional SCM for
>>> GIT which is JUST a copy of what's in CVS sounds like a waste o
Mike McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This sounds like something we could do, but I don't think we should do
> it. For one, after we move the hosted stuff away from cvs-int, that
> box will get a complete makover and one that, as far as I can tell,
> won't include git. I'm not sure what probl
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> Maintaining an accurate cvs->git mirror is not trivial (I know, from
> experience with the full repositories of coreutils, emacs, libc, and a
> few more). If you can do it well and keep it accurate, then it'd make
> a fin
Lennert Buytenhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For a while now, I've been maintaining a git conversion of the
> Fedora CVS tree, pulling in a copy of the CVS tree via rsync, and
> running some local scripts to convert that to git, incrementally
> updating the git tree as commits are made to the CVS
Jeremy Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 16:45 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I visited http://git.fedoraproject.org/?p=hosted/livecd
>> (all others are the same) and noticed that the usual list of
>> clonable git://, ssh://, http:// URLs is not d
Hi,
I visited http://git.fedoraproject.org/?p=hosted/livecd
(all others are the same) and noticed that the usual list of
clonable git://, ssh://, http:// URLs is not displayed.
Can someone here fix that?
Here's how:
Determine what file gitweb.cgi is using for its config.
(probably just /etc/gitw
Hi,
FYI, for the last week or so I've been mirroring-to-git a couple of
sourceware-hosted CVS repositories:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.device-mapper.devel/3758
Why? In case it's not obvious (beyond the dVCS distributed vs.
non-distributed argument): you can do a lot of thing
22 matches
Mail list logo
