On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:54:46 -0500, Luke Macken wrote:
> the system is going to need to access the build
> results of plague anyway, so I'm wondering if it would be best to
> implement some sort of xmlrpc call to have plague stage the packages for
> us? Since plague and bodhi (among other new pie
As an example, currently the builder status says
xenbuilder2.fedora.redhat.com (unavailable)
but
xenbuilder2 ~]$ /sbin/service plague-builder status
plague-builder (pid 1939) is running...
so assuming I wanted to restart it as a simple first step, where do
I find the documentation? Basi
$ rpm -q python-kid
python-kid-0.9-2.centos4
on buildsys.fedoraproject.org would benefit from an update to 0.9.5 which
includes xml related fixes and makes it possible to create pages that
don't fail in the w3c validator.
$ rpm -q --whatrequires python-kid
repoview-0.5.1-1.centos4
__
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:08:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> $ rpm -q python-kid
> python-kid-0.9-2.centos4
>
> on buildsys.fedoraproject.org would benefit from an update to 0.9.5 which
> includes xml related fixes and makes it possible to create pages that
> don't fa
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:47:20 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:08:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> >
> >> $ rpm -q python-kid
> >> python-kid-0.9-2.centos4
> >>
> >> on buildsys.fedo
> Software error:
>
> install_driver(mysql) failed: Can't locate DBD/mysql.pm in @INC (@INC
> contains: -snip- .) at (eval 4) line 3.
> Perhaps the DBD::mysql perl module hasn't been fully installed,
> or perhaps the capitalisation of 'mysql' isn't right.
> Available drivers: ExampleP, Proxy, Spon
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:11:23 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >> Software error:
> >>
> >> install_driver(mysql) failed: Can't locate DBD/mysql.pm in @INC (@INC
> >> contains: -snip- .) at (eval 4) line 3.
> >> Perhaps t
On buildsys.fedoraproject.org, all users' home directories have been
reset/emptied again. Why?
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:02:20 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:47:20 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> > Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:08:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 09:32:03 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:02:20 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:47:20 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 11:22:08 -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
> > On buildsys.fedoraproject.org, all users' home directories have been
> > reset/emptied again. Why?
> >
>
> /srv/extras-push/bin/create-user-push-env.sh
> Does this script DTRT to recreate needed symlinks in your home
> directory? I w
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:23:31 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > So, what is the formal procedure for requesting a package update on the
> > > buildsys server like described above and getting an official and final
> > > reply?
> > >
> > Get someone ups
On Thu, 10 May 2007 09:14:41 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:23:31 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> >
> > Why is it so damned difficult to get a single package updated although
> > I even provided the prepared rpms? This is turning into a
On Thu, 10 May 2007 09:40:50 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > When I used a local copy of Yum 2.6.x to get something done, I was flamed.
> > When I ask for an official update of an installed rpm, I need a lot
> > of energy to run against closed doors.
> >
>
> You weren't flamed, you were denied.
On Thu, 10 May 2007 09:19:05 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > Get someone upstream (RHEL) to accept the package changes. buildsys
> > is going away in days anyway after koji goes live.
>
> It's bad form to ignore one person and ask the same of others.
Are you kidding?
Who ignores you? Here is t
On Thu, 10 May 2007 12:26:43 -0500 (CDT), Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Other than w3c validation failing nothing is broken. an end user goes to
> view the repoview pages they see the correct thing.
That's far from a good reason to not fix it nevertheless. Afterall, part
of the development includes m
On Thu, 10 May 2007 10:18:56 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > machine. Who decides on what packages from that mysterious private repo
> > are "supported" on that machine or not? Seth?
> >
> Anyone with admin access to that box. If someone wants to install the
> RPM on that box and make sure it
On Fri, 11 May 2007 14:21:43 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
> o Repo cleaner. We need something like RepoPrune.py/fedora-updates-clean
> to run occasionally and clean up our tree.
There's also repomanage, ready to use:
$ rpm -qf $(which repomanage)
yum-utils-1.0.3-1.fc6
It has been us
On Thu, 17 May 2007 13:58:48 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> koji gives the following error:
>
> Mod_python error: "PythonHandler mod_python.publisher"
When exactly?
Is this when you tried to install it yourself?
(Then don't forget the configuration of either TLS or Kerberos)
__
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/logout.cgi
prints the Python code instead of executing it:
#!/usr/bin/python
import website
website.clear_auth()
website.print_header("Logout Done")
website.print_footer("Logout Done")
___
Fedora-infrastructur
Are there any infrastructure volunteers who want to fix (or get rid of)
broken stuff on http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/ that is in a desolate
state for many months or more than a year, respectively?
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/bonsai/toplevel.cgi?treeid=extras
(unusable for over a year) - https:/
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 14:23:15 +0200, jan birsa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I hope you can help me here.
> My friend tryed to become a Fedora ambassador, but he gets this:
> "With regards to "Fedora Individual Contributor License Agreement".
>
> Your message could not be processed.
>
> Reason:
>
> The s
1)
> Please submit bugs to https://fedorahosted.org/fas2/
gives just: Environment not found
2)
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/dump-group.cgi
500 Internal Server Error
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-lis
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 08:16:16 -0400, Jeffrey Tadlock wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > 2)
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/dump-group.cgi
>
> This has been replaced with this I believe:
>
> https://admin.fedo
On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 09:56:43 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 08:16:16 -0400, Jeffrey Tadlock wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >>> 2)
> >>>
> >>&
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 13:13:21 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > I ran into this when showing someone the new interface last week.
> > The way we ended up working with it was to create a small FasClient
> > class using BaseClient from the python-fedora package.
>
> That was m
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 12:28:28 -0500 (CDT), Mike McGrath wrote:
> > Just using urllib and user:[EMAIL PROTECTED] was enough here.
>
> Alternatively I suspect you can pass
>
> ?user_name=user&password=password&login=Login
If that are the correct key=value pairs for the login form, yes. That's
simil
A commit to Fedora non-pkg CVS triggered the following:
[...]
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:28:08 -0400
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: mschwendt
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
The original message was received at Mon, 21 Jul 2008
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:10:33 -0500 (CDT), Mike McGrath wrote:
> We had some mail issues today wrt cvs mail. If you get this again please
> let us know. I made some changes today that fixed nirik's and someone
> elses issue but may have introduced another. I was never able to recreate
> the erro
Is the "extras_signers" group in FAS still needed for anything?
Is it still used for ownership of any files on buildsys.fedoraproject.org?
(e.g. the pushscript cvs checkout) If so, can't the same files be owned by
the epel_signers? In either case, I no longer seem to be able to access those
files
[EMAIL PROTECTED] audacity]$ cvs commit -m 'mention upstream plans on
1.3.6-beta' README
Access denied: mschwendt is not in ACL for rpms/audacity
cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed
cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first!
That used to work. I'm co-maintainer:
https://admin.fedorap
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:30:30 -0500 (CDT), Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] audacity]$ cvs commit -m 'mention upstream plans on
> > 1.3.6-beta' README
> > Access denied: mschwendt is not in ACL for
There has been an invalid entry returned by the FAS group dump for some
time:
bbs,disabled,james francis toy iv,user,0
It contains no email address, but "disabled" in the addr field.
Now there's another invalid entry:
mahmoudelmegheny,mahmoud,[EMAIL PROTECTED],Mahmoud Ali,user,0
This e
New breakage! This time in pkgdb bugzilla plain dump. These two
incomplete and broken entries are returned:
Fedora|php-pear-Auth|provides methods for creating an authentication system
using
PHP|rakesh||
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedo
I wonder whether it is possible to use a fedoraproject.org email
alias in bugzilla without decoupling it from FAS?
The connection between a bugzilla account and a Fedora account is
based on the primary email address in FAS, right? So, if I update my
bugzilla preferences to use the fedoraproject ma
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:24:13 -0500, Michael Stahnke wrote:
> I think I solved the repo-closure/deps scripts issues. Now it should
> be back to sending only one email, (instead of 6).
If I knew where I could find the original script, I could contribute
proof-reading. I dunno what infrastructure g
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:33:12 -0500, Michael Stahnke wrote:
> Hmm, that might be why I having odd issues. The problem when I was
> testing was that every time the dep list was blank. It seemed like
> that for/else combo was blanking out the container of broken deps.
That's by design. At least on
With the arrival of this message, I've left the following groups in the
Fedora Account System:
extras_signers
sysadmin
Thanks to Warren Togami and Seth Vidal for the trust in me that lead to
the initial group membership.
pgpZ1eW12wLpV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:38:43 +0100, Sascha wrote:
> The Filesystem is btw. marked as needs_recovery.
Which can be harmless, because it is a feature flag that is also
set if dumpe2fs is run on a mounted fs. It means that there are blocks
that still need to be committed, which is pretty normal for a
As the fedoraproject aliases have trouble forwarding mail to GMX, I've
changed my FAS account to use my Google Mail address. I've confirmed
the change meanwhile.
In bugzilla, however, my account still uses my GMX address. And I cannot
change that. When I try to change it, I get:
There is alre
On Wed, 20 May 2009 08:13:40 -0500 (CDT), Mike wrote:
> On Wed, 20 May 2009, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > As the fedoraproject aliases have trouble forwarding mail to GMX, I've
> > changed my FAS account to use my Google Mail address. I've confirmed
> > the cha
How often is bugzilla.redhat.com updated with changes in Fedora pkgdb?
It has yet to sync the audacious* ownership changes from June 29th.
Perhaps it's broken?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/describecomponents.cgi?product=Fedora
___
Fedora-infrastructure-l
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:59:46 -0600 (CST), Mike wrote:
> $ date -d '2009-12-11 02:00:00 UTC'
> Thu Dec 10 20:00:00 CST 2009
> > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
> > > or run:
> > >
> > > date -d 'date -d '2009-12-11 02:
43 matches
Mail list logo
