On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 09:37:22PM -0800, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> > This has been completed and building is back to normal. please report any
> > odd failures. there has been a very large change in koji.
> > noarch subpackages are now supported, which needs srpms to be buil
> This has been completed and building is back to normal. please report any
> odd failures. there has been a very large change in koji.
> noarch subpackages are now supported, which needs srpms to be built in a
> chroot. the last of F-11's features that needed koji chanes are now ready
> to
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:55:35AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 10:02 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > on the
> > > netapp.
> >
> > Er, this is on nfs1 right, not the netapp?
> >
>
> My mistake, correct. All this is on nfs1 w
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 02:30:24PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 12:45 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 07:03:52PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > > > Mike McGrath wro
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 07:03:52PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Mike McGrath wrote:
>
>>
>> Anyone know when zenoss will be in Fedora? It is a requisite of ours.
>> Even an estimate?
>
> Doesn't look like it is going to be soon looking at
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435470
>
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 02:51:38PM +1000, Rob K wrote:
> Where could OpenNMS fit into this? They've been pretty friendly to us,
> and it's a solid bit of gear.
OpenNMS is rock solid, but it's Tomcat/Java powered... would it run
well with OpenJDK? Is Fedora open to using Sun's JDK? Also, although
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 02:59:04PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> Okay, so while this was intended to be a primary discussion point for
> tomorrows Infrastructure meeting we had a little bit of discussion first in
> #fedora-admin, and then in #fedora-meeting regarding Zabbix, a tool like
> Nagios t
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 01:49:54PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> There's been some requests to log #fedora-meeting automatically. There's
> technical issues there like where to store them, is there a way to auto
> start / stop meetings, etc.
>
> Lets discuss. thoughts?
>
I suppose you guys h
> Does anybody know how SourceForge deal with that? I receive mail sent via
> @users.sf.net alias without any problem.
Perhaps your ISP made an exclusion for them?
I used to work at an ISP and quickly realized it was much more useful
to have SPF as a spam scoring contributor, rather than hard re
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 10:42:58PM +0100, Kostas Georgiou wrote:
> > >It'd require patches to moin. IE: We'd either have to get rid of all of
> > >the users or gut the mailing section of the wiki I guess. Just a
> > >reminder to those that aren't familiar with it. Moin iterates over
> > >ever
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 11:44:35AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>
> > See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RayVanDolson#Moin for my project
> > notes on this. My own personal wiki contains the most information
> > about what I've tried so far.
&
Have been doing some Moin testing on my own (was able to get
compareable delays after generating ~3500 Moin users on my own wiki).
Turns out the #moin-dev guys don't like hotshots (sounds like it is
pretty unreliable) and prefer cProfile (which is in Python 2.5).
I cooked up this little patch to
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 10:50:56AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Mike McGrath wrote:
> > Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> >>
> >> Will you guys discuss at the next meeting? What's the next step to
> >> know if this RFR is approved or not?
> >>
> &g
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 09:33:53AM -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 22:47 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> > >
> > > Also, I noticed this:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/
> I'm sure your works would be appreciated by the upstream moin people. A lot
> of people do use Moin and ticket #31 is a long ways away :)
>
> -Mike
Personally, I love Moin. If we can just get it to be a little
faster... :)
I know you guys are a little hesitant about PHP in general als
> > Anyone out there run the profiler on a call to notifySubscribers() or
> > getSubscribers()?
> >
> > It doesn't seem the Moin user storage system lends itself to being very
> > fast. Each user seems to be a separate text file which must be parsed.
> > Probably would be much faster with a sqlite
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 04:23:24PM +0200, Christian Iseli wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:16:31 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > Our ticketing system has moved:
> >
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Tickets
>
> I feel really dumb, but I read that page and can't find *where* to
> subm
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:30:23AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:58:39AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >
> >> I've been meaning to do this for a long time:
> >>
> >> http://fedor
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:58:39AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> I've been meaning to do this for a long time:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/CommonProblems
>
> Please add to it and make it not stink :)
Mike, regarding the Wiki Pages Slow Save issue... are their any bugs
file
> Any questions?
Any reason not to use MySQL replication instead of doing the dump
between boxes (I don't know Postgres, but I assume it has something
similar)?
Just wanting the resources to be dedicated to each DB platform or use
it more as a backup instead of a hot failover?
Just curious... n
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 01:49:55AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> So why didn't you bail out and what are you happy with? Not rhetoric. I am
> genuinely interested to know.
I started lurking on some of the #fedora channels and jumped on a bunch
of the mailing lists. In the end, listening to a
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 01:32:51AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> > A simpler wiki setup is actually on its way. quaid, paulobanon: care to
> > comment further?
>
> They are waiting on infrastructure team to enable click through signup on
> the wiki. Karsten Wade (qu
This question stems from a post on the CentOS mailing list -- a fellow
wanted to add a couple items to the EPEL Wishlist but wasn't sure how.
I suggested he get a Wiki account and add it himself (probably should
have just added it for him, but...). In any case, here's his rant:
http://lists.ce
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 04:52:38PM -0400, Jason Watson wrote:
>
> This seems too easy. Am I missing something? :)
>
You missed what I missed -- the 24 hour part. :)
Ray
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:36:24PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> I've got a script request for anyone who's interested (I'm both busy and too
> lazy to write it myself)
>
> I'd like to count the number of 'updates-released-7' requests in our mirror
> logs that have happened in the last 24 hou
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 06:31:25PM +0200, Marek Mahut wrote:
> Thomas Chung wrote:
> > On 6/8/07, Karsten Wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 08:36 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >> > Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> > > Hi
> >> > >
> >> > > Just a quick reminder that this hasn't be
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 09:13:23PM +0200, Oliver Falk wrote:
> No. It's fine; If you have some 'strange looking' login/account-name
> like the fluffyone23 you mentioned, it's better to go with
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] For me [EMAIL PROTECTED] is fine. :-)
So is [EMAIL PROTECTED] taken? If not, maybe
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 03:29:16PM -0200, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> I don't like this.
>
> I don't like to work for a company who give the name of my email address,
> who choice the style of my hair, the style of my shirt's.
I don't think he's saying it will be mandatory. Some Ambassadors
pr
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 01:58:48PM -0400, Wilmer Jaramillo M. wrote:
> Hi, I have a suggestion, because don't is set the "Reply-to" header
> for fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com on mailing list?. When I
> answer a mail, only one _should_ receive the mail, but all of the
> internal list possibl
29 matches
Mail list logo
