On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 09:27:18AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
So I woke up today and we're still having dns issues on at least one of my
hosts.
Could everyone that has access please do a dig fedoraproject.org on all
their hosts and tell me if any of them cannot resolve?
Working from
I'd just like to say thanks to G_work, mdomsch, lmacken, ricky,
ivazquez, mikem, and mbonnet. Thanks to the efforts of all of these people
we have finally succeeded in adding csrf protection to all of the web apps
we've coded for infrastructure[1]_. Congratulations guys on closing a
security
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 09:15:32PM +0530, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
Hi,
When I try to test TG2 apps on publictest machines, they shout about
python 2.4 and what not.
Is there a spare machine which runs python 2.6? If yes, I could use it.
Thanks.
Fedora Community is TG2 and it runs on
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:12:14PM +0530, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
easy_install -U pysqlite
is not working for last few hours.
http://pastebin.com/m343eee84
Thanks.
AFAIK, pysqlite has moved to googlecode -- if something is redirecting to
pysqlite.org, then that needs to be fixed
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 03:08:06PM -0500, pablomar wrote:
hi guys,
my name is pablo martinez, I've been using fedora at home since version 3
I'm C/C++ and Java programmer and I did a little of python some years ago (I
still use it for small things). I've also worked with Oracle and Pro*C
I
This is just a notice that PackageDB development is shifting to the 0.5.x
branch and what that means if you have a checkout for hacking.
First, the big news is that 0.5.x has been branched. We'll be working on
stabilizing this with the goal of having a working version before Fedora
13 alpha
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 02:50:26PM -0500, Ricky Zhou wrote:
Thanks to Sijis for pointing this need out.
diff --git a/modules/fedora-web/files/redirects.conf
b/modules/fedora-web/files/redirects.conf
index a88613f..a679ebd 100644
--- a/modules/fedora-web/files/redirects.conf
+++
Tomorrow, after change freeze is over, I'll be updating the PackageDB to
0.4.1. This is a bugfix release so I don't expect any problems but you
never know :-)
-Toshio
pgpawAaTstfQq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:47:46PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
the syntax is actually 'ignore nonreadable'. man rsyncd.conf.
+1s?
diff --git a/modules/rsync/files/rsyncd.conf.secondary1
b/modules/rsync/files/rsyncd.conf.secondary1
index 0fbee6c..bc3c301 100644
---
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:04:08AM -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Hopefully we have 2.4 as the minimum version. I'm pretty sure 2.4 is
ubiquitous
even on the enterprise-y distributions, but if we need older, we can try for
that as well.
Just a note. If you're targeting RHEL/CentOS4 as your
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 05:08:03PM -0400, Mike McLean wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
The daemon distinction might be wrong thing to fixate on here. There
is nothing in that distinction that should exclude python (or most any
language). I think
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 03:47:35PM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Mike McGrath wrote:
I'd like to remove the following files from /srv/web/review-stats/
rm -rf tmppVPdGv tmpJYphwq tmp0OL7_T tmp_E_x5e ACCEPT.html REJECT.html
REVIEW.html
Very trivial, but we're still change
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 12:11:13AM -0400, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2009-10-07 11:07:53 PM, Nick Bebout wrote:
I'd like to request approval (on behalf of Susmit) to do the following
(As outlined in the FreeMedia Infrastructure SOP):
cd /puppet/modules/freemedia/files
cp
On 10/05/2009 08:40 AM, matt_dom...@dell.com wrote:
Requesting +1s to apply this hotfix, which only affects the MM crawler.
--
Matt Domsch
Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux
-Original Message-
From: Fedora Infrastructure
I have a new deltarpm package built for the rel-eng repo:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1721745
I can put it into the rel-eng repository to update the servers but who
do I talk to about testing it? We'll also need approval to brakinfra
change freeze to deploy it once it's
On 10/01/2009 11:25 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
I have a new deltarpm package built for the rel-eng repo:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1721745
I can put it into the rel-eng repository to update the servers but who
do I talk
On 09/28/2009 10:41 AM, Davi Vercillo C. Garcia wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing this e-mail for explain why I'm away from the group,
avoiding bad speculations about my collaborations to Fedora Project.
When I've started to try to help this team, I thought that my
knowledge was enough to do those
On 09/23/2009 01:34 PM, Jon Stanley wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like the user Georgia10 just inserted spam on that page.
Aiyiyi.
What's our procedure for deleting/disabling a rogue FAS account? It
appears that the account in
Due to some bad examples on how to port code to wsgi, pretty much all of
our apps put configuration information into the wsgi scripts that
startup our apps. This is bad practice and we should stop now. The
reasons this is bad:
* There should be only one place that a config is set.
* Config
On 09/22/2009 05:27 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
We might want to send these suggestions to upstream docs
as well, certainly their example page :: cough cough :: :)
Do you remember where you got the examples from?
Toshio, can you think of any reason putting variables like this in the
wsgi
mirrormanager uses the TurboGears raise redirect('/new/url') idiom
heavily. Today we found that whenever such a redirect was occurring in
staging, the users browser would end up at the production mirrormanager
site instead of staging. mmcgrath traced this to cherrypy creating URLs
like this:
On 09/03/2009 11:38 PM, Karsten Wade wrote:
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 02:17:44PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
At last week's meeting we made a decision about which licenses would
best fit our needs. The results are recorded here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Licensing
I
Over the past few months, Fedora Infrastructure has been discussing
having a consistent set of licenses for applications and scripts we
create for Fedora. The goals of doing this were to
* Be able to share code among the various programs that we write.
* Not have our libraries force a specific
On 08/26/2009 09:35 AM, Christian Del Pino wrote:
Hello everyone,
My name is Chris. I am looking to contribute my skills and time to the
Fedora Infrastructure group.
I started using Linux back in 1996 while in college. In 2005, I became a
system administrator at a small company helping
On 08/24/2009 02:32 AM, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to join the Infrastructure team, so here is my introduction.
I'm a junior system engineer. I have a short (one year) experience
managing RHEL (2.1 to 5, yes we still have 2.1 in production :'( ) web
servers running J2EE
On 08/24/2009 03:08 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
---
manifests/servergroups/proxy.pp |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/manifests/servergroups/proxy.pp b/manifests/servergroups/proxy.pp
index bdea7b6..70bbcf4 100644
--- a/manifests/servergroups/proxy.pp
On 08/18/2009 11:19 AM, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
Got the outline of my proposal here
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SugarZilla
I welcome any comments
I dislike the idea of anonymous opening of bugs and anonymous commenting
in bugzilla. It's not clear from the proposal if that's a
On 08/19/2009 04:41 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
I missed a few files in my earlier change request.
---
modules/sigul/manifests/init.pp |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/modules/sigul/manifests/init.pp b/modules/sigul/manifests/init.pp
index
A data corruption bug was found in the current xz package for certain
files. The xz package was updated to a snapshot in Fedora and EPEL.
We'd like to update the builders with the new xz to make sure we aren't
producing packages with corrupted payloads.
The corruption bug report is here:
On 08/19/2009 06:29 PM, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
On 08/18/2009 11:19 AM, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
Got the outline of my proposal here
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SugarZilla
I welcome any comments
I dislike the idea of anonymous opening of bugs and anonymous commenting
in bugzilla. It's
On 08/19/2009 08:09 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 08/19/2009 07:10 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
The host xz wouldn't be used to produce any rpms, the rpm inside the
chroot would. Does this come into play when initing the buildroot?
You're right, this wouldn't come into play unless it's
On 08/17/2009 03:48 PM, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
Hi guys and gals,
I am looking to join both the sysadmin-test and sysadmin-cvs groups. Why you
might ask? Well I'll tell you. I wan't to get more involved in Fedora.
Here is my current Fedora resume...
- BugZapper for both KDE and
Currently we're mounting /mnt/fedora ro on puppet1. I think that this
was a change committed in puppet that affected the /etc/fstab file.
That didn't come into play until we rebooted puppet1 last night -- the
reboot caused the new fstab to be used and mount /mnt/fedora ro.
Here's the changeset
On 08/13/2009 10:00 AM, Luke Macken wrote:
Hey Guys,
I'd like to do a bodhi masher upgrade on releng2 and relepel1. There are no
critical changes for the app1-6 bodhi instances, so there is no need to
upgrade
those just yet. Effected code paths for releng2/relepel1 bodhi mashers:
On 08/13/2009 02:14 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
The db connection limit errors were our fault, we'll look into those
separately, the rest of the spam should go to l10n-admin-members instead
:-)
---
modules/transifex/templates/00-default.conf.erb |5 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4
On 08/11/2009 09:09 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
+1 to make this change. Things are screwey enought right now wihtout
it accidently doing it .
+1
-Toshio
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Ricky Zhouri...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
In light of what I just did to xen15, I'd like to make this
On 08/11/2009 06:30 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
Turns out there's yet another kernel update available for RHEL5. Since
I've run into issues updating a kernel and not other packages I'd like us
to do a yum update of all the packages. We shouldn't be far off but
there's a kernel and glibc update
On 08/07/2009 08:23 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, satya komaragiri wrote:
K, so this is for the zikula deployment. Go ahead and apply for
sysadmin-test and we'll get this all taken care of.
smooge, ricky or toshio, if I'm not around would one of you mind helping
answer
Sorry, I'm not receiving these bounces for some reason :-(
On 08/01/2009 10:35 PM, Domsch, Matt wrote:
1) typo Mistmatch in the subject line of these messages:
Subject: Undeliverable: Fedora Account System and Bugzilla Mistmatch
2) an insane number of these messages are being sent each
On 08/02/2009 12:43 AM, Brennan Ashton wrote:
This might be slightly off the topic, but I think it relates to the
reported issue in the bounced email. I have been noticing that when I
run this script:
from bugzilla import Bugzilla
from fedora.client import AccountSystem
url =
On 07/28/2009 08:16 AM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Hopefully, this will provide a solid groundwork for Thursday's discussions.
Excellent! I think this provides some good options for us wrt
distributing changes for production. Are the questions about our
staging and publictest environments
On 07/28/2009 08:16 AM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Q: Do config changes count as code changes if the config file is marked
as being AGPL?
Red Hat Legal feels that changes to configuration lines inside a script
do not represent a copyrightable change to the script, and therefore
they do not
On 07/28/2009 12:09 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 07/28/2009 12:06 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 07/28/2009 08:16 AM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Hopefully, this will provide a solid groundwork for Thursday's discussions.
Excellent! I think this provides some good options for us wrt
On 07/28/2009 01:21 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 07/28/2009 03:38 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Should we ask Legal if we could stick Apache Basic Auth (using
mod_auth_postgres) in front of staging and then it would be okay? Or if
we used openvpn to connect to http(s) on staging
Today we added the transif user to the packager group because transifex
lost the ability to add translations for comps. At the moment, this
doesn't affect much -- packager group only gives you the ability to
commit to comps and what packages you are given explicit rights to.
However, it may
Okay, We've got to do some work for AGPL compliance with moksha.
First, a few restrictions that we'll have to live with until we can
figure out a legal way to do them better:
* We cannot do development work directly fedoracommunity/moksha on
staging for now. All fedoracommunity/moksha changes
On 07/28/2009 03:58 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Today we added the transif user to the packager group because transifex
lost the ability to add translations for comps. At the moment, this
doesn't affect much -- packager group only gives you the ability to
commit to comps and what packages you
Original Message
Subject: Re: Is F-community using its FAS account?
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:35:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: John Palmieri jo...@redhat.com
To: Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com
It is used for getting a user's info when you are not logged in similar
On 07/23/2009 11:48 AM, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 01:46:45PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:09:04AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Resending since spot didn't get it the first time.
Okay, at the infrastructure meeting this week we had a long discussion
Resending since spot didn't get it the first time.
Okay, at the infrastructure meeting this week we had a long discussion
about using AGPL in infrastructure and we decided we need more
information about what the AGPL requires of us. Here's a run down and
then the questions we had.
== What we
On 07/18/2009 10:39 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Fri July 17 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
So I guess I need a seperate FAS account for this and apply for
fedorabugs or is there some other way to do this? The ftbfs bugzilla
account is capable of changing the status iirc.
Okay, I've taken care
So I guess I need a seperate FAS account for this and apply for
fedorabugs or is there some other way to do this? The ftbfs bugzilla
account is capable of changing the status iirc.
Okay, I've taken care of this in FAS. It should sync to bugzilla within
the hour. If not, let me know.
On 07/15/2009 05:00 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2009-07-15 01:41:52 AM, Davi Vercillo C. Garcia wrote:
I would like to help Fedora community grow and keep moving... (Johnny
Walker ? =P)
As you've seen already, we mostly hang out in #fedora-admin. We also
have weekly meetings on Thursdays at
Alright! So the last two weeks there wasn't much comment on:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1524
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Licensing
but I think people were either sleeping or didn't entirely understand
what the AGPL's requirements mean for us as
On 07/16/2009 04:10 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 15:57 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
* admin.stg.fedoraproject.org is accessible by the general public but it
isn't meant for the general public's use -- it's for developers to
collaborate on what will be on the production site
ricky and I were considering adding patch to global.pp and dennis
brought up that it might be a command used to do malicious stuff. So
what do you guys think?
Pros:
patch makes some things much easier to do. Want to cherrypick a change
as a hotfix? Many times patch is needed to apply the diff.
On 07/16/2009 08:50 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 19:59 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
What's the consensus here?
If we install patch, will git come next, since people will want to git
am stuff? Not that I'm against having patch, it would make things
easier.
Well I won't
On 07/16/2009 08:59 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
+0 no opinion if it would be of some use. I've generally scp'd files
where needed and copied from there. Same number of commands and files
copied as if you were to patch
scp blah.py app1: ; ssh app1 ; sudo cp blah.py /usr/blah
scp blah.patch
On 07/10/2009 03:44 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
I'm going to document this somewhere, we talked about it on IRC a while
back but I never sent an email to the list.
Hot patching servers is bad! Don't do it! But if you _must_ do it for
whatever reason, you _MUST_ open a ticket about it and leave
On 07/02/2009 07:03 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/02/2009 08:53 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Hi, I've had a chance to talk to spot and I've drafted the following
policy about licensing the things that we write in Fedora Infrastructure:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Licensing
On 07/02/2009 05:07 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
How often is bugzilla.redhat.com updated with changes in Fedora pkgdb?
It has yet to sync the audacious* ownership changes from June 29th.
Perhaps it's broken?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/describecomponents.cgi?product=Fedora
This should be
On 07/01/2009 05:39 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Mike McGrathmmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Mike McGrathmmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm not
Hi, I've had a chance to talk to spot and I've drafted the following
policy about licensing the things that we write in Fedora Infrastructure:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Licensing
Do people like it? Is a GPL family license pretty much everywhere good
for everyone or are
On 07/01/2009 09:37 PM, Nigel Jones wrote:
- Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I've had a chance to talk to spot and I've drafted the following
policy about licensing the things that we write in Fedora
Infrastructure:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Should we set this to send messages to an admin wide alias?
fedora-infrastructure-list might be a little broad but
ad...@fedoraproject.org or something?
---
diff --git a/modules/transifex/templates/00-default.conf.erb
b/modules/transifex/templates/00-default.conf.erb
index fa7ad88..172c750 100644
Hi,
I've branched 0.4.x as the new stable development branch of the
packagedb. If you have bugfixes you should commit them there. If you
have features that do not remove or change the API incompatibly (ie,
removing URLs served or changing the parameters that the URLs take) you
may commit them
I'm going to be going to Brazil for FISL and a FUDCon this week. I'm
not sure what my Internet situation is going to be but if anything comes
up send me a message and I'll work on it once I get the message.
-Toshio
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
If anyone would like to test the PackageDB release for Monday, I now
have a release candidate running in the staging environment and packages
built for cvsadmins to install and test the admin client.
The web interface is here:
https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb
Client software for
On 06/10/2009 09:28 PM, Luke Macken wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:17:57PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
So without knowing it we started using AGPLv3 code in our environment
recently for fedora community and moksha. In the past I think all of our
stuff has been GPL(ish) mostly GPLv2 (toshio
On 06/05/2009 12:23 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
I should explain this better, I want to change it because it's causing
some issues in staging, but it will cause this package to get updated on
bapp1. Should be low risk.
+1
-Toshio
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 06/04/2009 12:05 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
---
.../nodes/secondary1.fedora.phx.redhat.com.pp |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/manifests/nodes/secondary1.fedora.phx.redhat.com.pp
b/manifests/nodes/secondary1.fedora.phx.redhat.com.pp
index
On 06/04/2009 02:45 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
---
manifests/services/fedoracommunity.pp | 186
-
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 186 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 manifests/services/fedoracommunity.pp
diff --git a/manifests/services/fedoracommunity.pp
On 06/04/2009 02:47 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Mike McGrath wrote:
---
manifests/services/fedoracommunity.pp | 186
-
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 186 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 manifests/services/fedoracommunity.pp
That's a
On 05/29/2009 02:32 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2009-05-29 04:31:18 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
This one's an oops, probably on me. I happened to notice proxy1 is an
x86_64 box. We have two options.
1) double it's ram
2) rebuild it as x86
I'd prefer to do 2 since the release slipped again and
On 05/29/2009 02:15 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
while I'm doing the httpd update, I'd like to update haproxy as well as
there were a number of change fixes that would be good to have in place
for the release:
http://haproxy.1wt.eu/download/1.3/src/CHANGELOG-1.3.18.X
2+1's?
+1
-Toshio
On 05/29/2009 02:11 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
I'd like to update httpd on our web servers and proxy boxes.
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1075.html
2+1's?
+1
-Toshio
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
On 05/26/2009 08:47 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Ricky Zhou wrote:
Sorry, the commit message wasn't as clear as it could have been.
backup1 has been running out of space on catalog backup jobs, as it
makes a temporary dump of the bacula database in
On 05/23/2009 08:32 AM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2009-05-23 12:08:30 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
If the FAS backend managed to create a new account in bugzilla, why would
I need to _change_ an existing one myself? Can't it sync bugzilla with my
email change in FAS? (which is what I expected it to
Right now FAS constructs email aliases only for accounts that are
active. This is causing us two problems.
1) We have recently implemented a bot status for accounts that makes
it so the account can't be logged into and don't go inactive. This
status needs to be allowed to get email as well.
Mike McGrath wrote:
Also disabling sftp on fedorahosted boxes
---
manifests/servergroups/hosted.pp |1 +
modules/ssh/manifests/init.pp |6 ++
modules/ssh/templates/sshd_config.erb |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
Mike McGrath wrote:
So xen13 actually seems (might be) fixed now. Hasn't rebooted since the
tech went out. So I want to move the databases that should be on db2,
back to db2. I know lots of work is being done right now though on
various systems so I want to coordinate with everyone.
Mike McGrath wrote:
Can I get 2 +1's to reboot app3 (which is currently frozen)
I'd like to power down xen13 and power it back up now that the BMC has
been flashed. There shouldn't be any impact to the users except that
/transifex/ will go down during the reboot. Which shouldn't be a
Matt Domsch wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:48:16PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 07:44:50PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
If you see me monkey with u-m-d-l on bapp1, that's what I'm trying to
figure out...
Found it...
update-master-directory-list was trying to be smart
A couple weeks ago we were having problems with xen13. db2 was on
xen13. We moved the databases that lived on db2 onto db3. That's been
working out pretty well as db3 was sized to run koji before the latest
round of koji optimizations so it's a pretty powerful box.
However, when we moved the
Ricky Zhou wrote:
We recently got some cron mail about a wrong killall path, so here's a
patch to mirrormanager to fix it.
---
mirrormanager.spec.in |2 +-
server/logrotate.conf |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mirrormanager.spec.in
Ionuț Arțăriși wrote:
Hello,
I've recently become interested in the openid part of FAS and have
already setup a server on my laptop and began hacking.
However, I think I would be much more productive using one of the test
servers in the infrastructure as this way I could actually test
Xavier Lamien wrote:
2009/3/30 Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Diego Búrigo Zacarão wrote:
I'm sorry guys, but we had a minor problem with the tar.gz on the previous
RPM.
Can I have +1's for a new update on app1 to the 0.5.1-2 building?
Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2009-03-27 09:11:56 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
I'd like to do
http://pastebin.ca/1374517
for
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1293
+1 with the fixes agreed upon in IRC (increment the values of the
constants and change the names to NS_TEST_DAY and
Jon Stanley wrote:
Inactive accounts could authenticate to sites using mod_auth_pgsql.
Pretty sure all of these apps are not under freeze, but rather be safe. Some
+1's?
+1
-Toshio
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Seth Vidal wrote:
Somehow fedora8 is still being looked for for the infofeed rss feed on
planet.fedoraproject.org. I'd like to remove this entry it is now
outputting cron errors.
can I get some +1's?
+1
-Toshio
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2009-03-18 08:35:02 PM, Diego Búrigo Zacarão wrote:
We want to update Transifex on app1 with the latest code tagged as 0.5
Release.
This shouldn't affect any other service on app1.
Can I have +1s?
+1
+1
-Toshio
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ricky Zhou wrote:
This should be a pretty safe security change to make transifex run under
the separate transifex user, instead of the apache user. I've tested it
out on publictest14.
The django transifex isn't 100% in puppet yet, so here are the steps I'd
like to take:
mv
Ricky Zhou wrote:
As requested by Paul at
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1269. I tested
this on staging, so this should be relatively safe.
---
configs/web/fedoraproject.org/modRewrite.conf |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
ricky and I have identified a piece of code in fas2's new safasprovider
that's querying the database a lot. It's causing anything that checks
identity to issue a query to the database to lookup the visit cookie.
This is causing things that lookup information on the identity multiple
times to take
mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mar 14, 2009, at 8:27 PM, Nigel Jones nigjo...@redhat.com wrote:
- Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
ricky and I have identified a piece of code in fas2's new
safasprovider
that's querying the database a lot. It's causing anything that
checks
Mike McGrath wrote:
I'd like to update app1 to transifex-0.5-0.6.rc1.hgc3439806202e
2+1's ?
+1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
Ricky Zhou wrote:
Apparently, the current upload.cgi isn't checking group permissions properly.
Here's a patch to simplify auth checking (and clean formatting up).
+1
Thanks ricky!
-Toshio
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ricky Zhou wrote:
---
manifests/servergroups/cvs.pp |4
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/manifests/servergroups/cvs.pp b/manifests/servergroups/cvs.pp
index 8dc4038..bc8d770 100644
--- a/manifests/servergroups/cvs.pp
+++
Found a template in fas that is not adding the csrf token properly.
The Add User button on:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/view/
This is just an annoyance (one particular link leading people to the
CSRF login page instead of directly to the action they requested) but
the fix is
A problem was discovered with django auth and redirects. I'm spinning a
new python-fedora package that has the fix for this and would like to
deploy it on the hosts that we have transifex installed: app1 and app2
This package does not need to be installed in other places but it
shouldn't hurt as
1 - 100 of 322 matches
Mail list logo
