RE: [Fwd: Re: CMS Option: Zikula]

2009-01-30 Thread Simon Birtwistle
> > That sounds awfully low for Postnuke. Doing a quick google search of > > postnuke security fixes and just looking at different releases.. > there > > should be about 20 with some amount in core and a lot in plugins. My > > information about the current state of PostNuke is not good. I am > > b

Re: [Fwd: Re: CMS Option: Zikula]

2009-01-29 Thread Mike McGrath
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > That sounds awfully low for Postnuke. Doing a quick google search of > postnuke security fixes and just looking at different releases.. there > should be about 20 with some amount in core and a lot in plugins. My > information about the current s

Re: [Fwd: Re: CMS Option: Zikula]

2009-01-29 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > 2009/1/29 Toshio Kuratomi : >> I sent this to the docs list when they started considering Zikula. Now >> that we're setting up a test instance and getting some people on the >> infrastructure team to work on it it seems like a good point in time to >> forward it here.

Re: [Fwd: Re: CMS Option: Zikula]

2009-01-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
2009/1/29 Toshio Kuratomi : > I sent this to the docs list when they started considering Zikula. Now > that we're setting up a test instance and getting some people on the > infrastructure team to work on it it seems like a good point in time to > forward it here. > > Original Message ---

[Fwd: Re: CMS Option: Zikula]

2009-01-29 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
I sent this to the docs list when they started considering Zikula. Now that we're setting up a test instance and getting some people on the infrastructure team to work on it it seems like a good point in time to forward it here. Original Message Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:55:03 -