Architectural Changes

2007-09-07 Thread Mike McGrath
As we talked about in the meeting yesterday we have a new sponsor (http://www.teliasonera.com/). There are a couple of others in the works (I don't want to officially announce until its finalized) but one thing is clear. Pretty soon we're going to have multiple proxy servers outside of PHX.

Re: Architectural Changes

2007-09-07 Thread Graeme Fowler
On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 17:03 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > So I ask those on the list to go to http://t.fedoraproject.org/ and just tell > me what you get. Google, at the moment. Graeme ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-l

Re: Architectural Changes

2007-09-07 Thread Anand Capur
On 9/7/07, Graeme Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 17:03 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > > So I ask those on the list to go to http://t.fedoraproject.org/ and just > tell > > me what you get. > > Google, at the moment. > > Graeme FP.O (Using Firefox) __

Re: Architectural Changes

2007-09-07 Thread Eric Kerby
On Sep 7, 2007, at 6:03 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: So I ask those on the list to go to http://t.fedoraproject.org/ and just tell me what you get. I get Google in Firefox, Safari, Opera, and curl on Mac OS X. I tried them in that order, so I'm not sure which results are do to DNS caching. -

Re: Architectural Changes

2007-09-07 Thread Ryan Ordway
Google, on Firefox and Safari on MacOS X. On 9/7/07 3:03 PM, "Mike McGrath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake: > As we talked about in the meeting yesterday we have a new sponsor > (http://www.teliasonera.com/). There are a couple of others in the > works (I don't want to officially announce until its

Re: Architectural Changes

2007-09-07 Thread Scott Thistle
Google English.. Graeme Fowler wrote: On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 17:03 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: So I ask those on the list to go to http://t.fedoraproject.org/ and just tell me what you get. Google, at the moment. Graeme ___ Fedora-infrastruc

Re: Architectural Changes

2007-09-07 Thread Mike McGrath
Ryan Ordway wrote: Google, on Firefox and Safari on MacOS X. Well it sounds like a lot of people are seeing different results from me. Which may mean its working right and my sample size just wasn't large enough. -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastru

Re: Architectural Changes

2007-09-07 Thread Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray
I get http://fedoraproject.org/ with Firefox. Regards, Debarshi -- GPG key ID: 63D4A5A7 Key server: pgp.mit.edu ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastruct

Re: Architectural Changes

2007-09-08 Thread Paulo Santos
FF - Yahoo IE7 - Yahoo On 9/8/07, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I get http://fedoraproject.org/ with Firefox. > > Regards, > Debarshi > -- > GPG key ID: 63D4A5A7 > Key server: pgp.mit.edu > > ___ > Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing

Re: Architectural Changes

2007-09-08 Thread Tim Lauridsen
Mike McGrath wrote: As we talked about in the meeting yesterday we have a new sponsor (http://www.teliasonera.com/). There are a couple of others in the works (I don't want to officially announce until its finalized) but one thing is clear. Pretty soon we're going to have multiple proxy serv

Re: Architectural Changes

2007-09-10 Thread Jens Petersen
Mike McGrath さんは書きました: So I ask those on the list to go to http://t.fedoraproject.org/ and just tell me what you get. Firefox on my F7 box and rawhide box sent me to fp.o. Jens ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@r

Some architectural changes

2008-10-07 Thread Mike McGrath
So we've finally completed some consolidation we've been working on for the past couple of months. We've also added a new class of server (bappX servers). What does this all mean? Well, app1+ are now all identical, for the most part. This allows us to think of our app servers as truly being par

Re: Some architectural changes

2008-10-07 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Mike McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So we've finally completed some consolidation we've been working on for > the past couple of months. We've also added a new class of server (bappX > servers). What does this all mean? > tres tres cool -- Stephen J Smoog

Re: Some architectural changes

2008-10-07 Thread Anand Capur
> > > So we've finally completed some consolidation we've been working on for > > the past couple of months. We've also added a new class of server (bappX > > servers). What does this all mean? > > > > tres tres cool > > > -- > Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux > How far that little candle thro

Re: Some architectural changes

2008-10-08 Thread Bret McMillan
Mike McGrath wrote: Well, app1+ are now all identical, for the most part. This allows us to think of our app servers as truly being part of a farm. The exception to this right now is those apps requiring our nfs mount in PHX. I'm still debating what to do about this but so far haven't really

Re: Some architectural changes

2008-10-08 Thread Mike McGrath
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Bret McMillan wrote: > Mike McGrath wrote: > > > Well, app1+ are now all identical, for the most part. This allows us to > > think of our app servers as truly being part of a farm. The exception to > > this right now is those apps requiring our nfs mount in PHX. I'm still >