On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Eugene Teo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
>> With the new process for getting (and staying) on Planet Fedora in
>> place, how does it affect GSoC-ers ?
>>
>> Do we have their blogs on the Planet ? And, do they get FedoraPeople.org
>>
On Sun, 25 May 2008, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Eugene Teo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
> >> With the new process for getting (and staying) on Planet Fedora in
> >> place, how does it affect GSoC-ers ?
> >>
> >> Do we have their blo
On Sat, 24 May 2008, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Sun, 25 May 2008, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Eugene Teo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
> > >> With the new process for getting (and staying) on Planet Fedora in
> > >> place, how d
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Mike McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 May 2008, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Eugene Teo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
>> >> With the new process for getting (and staying) on Planet F
On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 23:22 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > They can be found here
> > http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2008/05/19/changes-at-planet-fedora/
> >
>
> My personal feeling is that individuals that want to be on planet really
> should be a fedora contributor. The barriers are pretty low (a
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Karsten Wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It would be but I get the feeling that some aren't joining or aren't
>> allowed to because of google rules (I have no idea about either of
>> these, someone please correct me)
>
> Well, AIUI Google's whole point of getting
On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 23:27 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Alternatively, perhaps we should just have an GSoC group? These guys
> are
> technically contributors...
I didn't realize this discussion was cross-posted, I already sent my
agreement to this idea to the other thread. Having a group 'gso
On Tue, 27 May 2008, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 23:27 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> > Alternatively, perhaps we should just have an GSoC group? These guys
> > are
> > technically contributors...
>
> I didn't realize this discussion was cross-posted, I already sent my
>
On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 10:28 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2008, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 23:27 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >
> > > Alternatively, perhaps we should just have an GSoC group? These guys
> > > are
> > > technically contributors...
>
On Tue, 27 May 2008, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 10:28 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 May 2008, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 23:27 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > >
> > > > Alternatively, perhaps we should just have an GSoC g
On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 12:46 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2008, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 10:28 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 May 2008, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 23:27 -0500, Mike McGrath wr
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 01:54:08PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 12:46 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 May 2008, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 10:28 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 27 May 2008, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2008, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 01:54:08PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 12:46 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 May 2008, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 10:28 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > >
13 matches
Mail list logo
