Nothing's ever easy, is it?
So I got pdns up and going this afternoon with it's geo back end. It's
working as expected and everything is good. The problem is pdns's dnssec
implementation is... not particularly mature or really even usable AFAIK
with geodns.
Anyone out there doing both geo
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Nothing's ever easy, is it?
So I got pdns up and going this afternoon with it's geo back end. It's
working as expected and everything is good. The problem is pdns's
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Nothing's ever easy, is it?
So I got pdns up and going this afternoon with it's geo back end.
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Nothing's ever
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Nothing's ever easy, is it?
So I got pdns up and going this afternoon with it's geo back end. It's
working as expected and everything is good. The problem is pdns's dnssec
implementation is... not particularly mature
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Nothing's ever easy, is it?
So I got
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Mike McGrath
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
So, for example 'fedoraproject.org' wouldn't be signed, but
'us.fedoraproject.org' would be? I *think* that's possible but I haven't
gotten it to work. If I can get that to work though I guess that makes
sense because
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
So, for example 'fedoraproject.org' wouldn't be signed, but
'us.fedoraproject.org' would be? I *think* that's possible but I haven't
gotten it to work. If I can get that
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
So, for example 'fedoraproject.org' wouldn't be signed, but
'us.fedoraproject.org' would be? I
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
So, for example 'fedoraproject.org' wouldn't be
At the moment? Nothing.
On 21/11/2009, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Mike McGrath
Actually it does buy us some trust but as the roots aren't signed it's
fairly moot.
On 21/11/2009, Nigel Jones d...@nigelj.com wrote:
At the moment? Nothing.
On 21/11/2009, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:30 PM,
14 matches
Mail list logo