In order to push out the first round of Fedora 10 updates, a few changes
need to be made in the infrastructure.
1) add the 10 release to fedora-updates-push in puppet
2) Update bodhi with 10 mash configs
Can I get a few +1s on this?
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca:
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Jesse Keating wrote:
In order to push out the first round of Fedora 10 updates, a few changes
need to be made in the infrastructure.
1) add the 10 release to fedora-updates-push in puppet
2) Update bodhi with 10 mash configs
Can I get a few +1s on this?
+1
-sv
2008/11/21 Jesse Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In order to push out the first round of Fedora 10 updates, a few changes
need to be made in the infrastructure.
1) add the 10 release to fedora-updates-push in puppet
2) Update bodhi with 10 mash configs
Can I get a few +1s on this?
--
Jesse
Jesse Keating ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
In order to push out the first round of Fedora 10 updates, a few changes
need to be made in the infrastructure.
1) add the 10 release to fedora-updates-push in puppet
2) Update bodhi with 10 mash configs
Can I get a few +1s on this?
+1
Bill
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Matt Domsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?path=pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/10-Beta/Fedora/i386/iso/Fedora-10-Beta-i386-DVD.iso
Are these links supposed to work in Firefox (at least for testing)? I
get # Server Error when
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 08:34 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
Are these links supposed to work in Firefox (at least for testing)? I
get # Server Error when I click on it in Firefox.
There was some MirrorManager work done yesterday, are you still seeing
this issue?
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora --
2008/10/3 Jesse Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 08:34 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
Are these links supposed to work in Firefox (at least for testing)? I
get # Server Error when I click on it in Firefox.
There was some MirrorManager work done yesterday, are you still seeing
Great job with the release this morning, guys. I know there were some
gremlins in a torrent or two, but overall very painless and you guys
made it look easy (as always). Hurrah, another milestone on the path
to Cambridge!
If anyone has any issues, we could plant them on a page for the next
Paul W. Frields said the following on 09/30/2008 02:40 PM Pacific Time:
Great job with the release this morning, guys. I know there were some
gremlins in a torrent or two, but overall very painless and you guys
made it look easy (as always). Hurrah, another milestone on the path
to Cambridge!
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Great job with the release this morning, guys. I know there were some
gremlins in a torrent or two, but overall very painless and you guys
made it look easy (as always). Hurrah, another milestone on the path
to Cambridge!
If anyone has any
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 23:59:40 John Poelstra wrote:
One idea I had... could we be very explicit when we tell people where to
file bugs by giving them a full URL to rawhide so they don't have
navigate the bugzilla gauntlet?
Does anyone know how to format the URL so it goes straight to
Do we want to turn this page static for the Alpha release?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/10/Alpha/ReleaseNotes
I put out the last call for changes and am making a few myself. Is
there a good target for calling to static for now?
We'll want to make sure we can edit it. Perhaps as
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 01:57 -0700, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
Do we want to turn this page static for the Alpha release?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/10/Alpha/ReleaseNotes
I put out the last call for changes and am making a few myself. Is
there a good target for calling to
On 2008-08-05 12:57:54 AM, Nigel Jones wrote:
I think this would be a rather interesting experiment and I am sure that
Mediawiki will pass with flying colours :). And well, if it does turn
out we need to use static pages, then it's not that hard to do :).
+1 - I think mod_rewriting to static
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 23:44 -0400, Ricky Zhou wrote:
* Asterisk coolness?
I'm almost always available and willing to help out with Asterisk
stuff... Let me know if/when you need any help, and I'd be willing to
put in some time to add all kinds of Asterisk coolness.
-Jared
Things I'd like but probably can't work on myself:
* GeoIP/DNS based proxying. I'm in Europe and request
admin.fedoraproject.org I get the European app server. I'm in the US I
get PHX or tummy.
- This might make it possible for us to have app servers around the
world. We'd still have
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:15:28AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Things I'd like but probably can't work on myself:
[...]
* Optimize db calls within TG applications to make them as snappy as
possible. I can do this for SQLAlchemy but SQLObject isn't flexible
enough. Any page which is for
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 02:18:53PM -0400, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:15:28AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Things I'd like but probably can't work on myself:
[...]
* Optimize db calls within TG
On 2008-05-19 10:27:52 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
All in all I feel it was a good release. So my question to the team, what
would you all like to see over the next 6 months?
* New wiki :-)
* More/better documentation
* FAS improvements + Certificate Authority
* A more complete test
Mike McGrath wrote:
So F9 is out the door and we had a very exciting last 6 months. Here's
the short list:
* FAS2
* /mnt/koji migration and deployment
* Backup system up and running
* Collaboration servers brought up (gobby and asterisk POC)
* UTC switch
The focus for this last release
When we created the dist-f10 build targets I forgot to create a
corresponding static-repo for it. This diff will create one, and allow
people who are working on F10 actually be able to populate buildroots
from the f10 content and match koji.
RCS file: /cvs/puppet/configs/build/update-static
On Monday 12 May 2008, Jesse Keating wrote:
When we created the dist-f10 build targets I forgot to create a
corresponding static-repo for it. This diff will create one, and allow
people who are working on F10 actually be able to populate buildroots
from the f10 content and match koji.
RCS
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 09:30 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
I forgot to add one for dist-olpc3-build when i set it up. can we add
it
also ?
we can drop olpc2-trial3
+1 go ahead. I already did my change but you can still get yours in
before the cron job hits in 10~ minutes.
--
Jesse
23 matches
Mail list logo
