On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 02:11:47PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Two tech items I wanted to clear up for Fedora Talk FAD:
>
> First, qe discussed earlier using softphones for consistency and less
> equipment-lugging. Didn't hear any votes against so that's all we're
> planning at this point. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My systems don't have reliable microphones, so I use a real phone and
dial in.
Darren VanBuren
onekop...@gmail.com
http://theoks.net/
On Sep 30, 2009, at 3:23 PM, Ian Weller wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 02:11:47PM -0400,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 02:11:47PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> First, qe discussed earlier using softphones for consistency and less
> equipment-lugging. Didn't hear any votes against so that's all we're
> planning at this point. It also makes sense to concentrate on that
> use because the ma
Paul, Cheers to that, I miss read the site portion as if it were asking
about any potential concerns there. If you need any help in
developing/implementation of the additional services please feel free to
let me know. I am not always around in IRC but would be more than
willing to give a hand as ne
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 01:20:02PM -0500, t...@codero.com wrote:
> Generally from my experience the primary things that effect VoIP would
> be Packet loss, and Latency. There are tons of other things such as RF
> noise etc.. however those shouldnt* be an issue.
>
> Packet loss is going to be pret
Generally from my experience the primary things that effect VoIP would
be Packet loss, and Latency. There are tons of other things such as RF
noise etc.. however those shouldnt* be an issue.
Packet loss is going to be pretty obvious across the "wire" due to the
way it is normally handled (fill in
Two tech items I wanted to clear up for Fedora Talk FAD:
First, qe discussed earlier using softphones for consistency and less
equipment-lugging. Didn't hear any votes against so that's all we're
planning at this point. It also makes sense to concentrate on that
use because the majority of peopl