We need a Fedora search engine. Especially for docs. Options
1) Do we run our own?
2) Do we use google.
I love 2, its easy. But it is, non-OSS. So there are moral issues at
stake here. (though I've not used google to exclusively search through
our sites, it may suck at it, who knows :
I use Lucene, and works pretty well. But its written in Java
Paulo
On Jan 30, 2008 5:57 PM, Mike McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We need a Fedora search engine. Especially for docs. Options
>
> 1) Do we run our own?
>
> 2) Do we use google.
>
> I love 2, it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike McGrath wrote:
> We need a Fedora search engine. Especially for docs. Options
>
> 1) Do we run our own?
I 110% recommend running our own.
> 2) Do we use google.
I'd like to not.
>
> I love 2, its easy. But it is,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:57:23AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> We need a Fedora search engine. Especially for docs. Options
>
> 1) Do we run our own?
>
> 2) Do we use google.
>
> I love 2, its easy. But it is, non-OSS. So there are moral issues at
> stake here
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Luke Macken wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:57:23AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > We need a Fedora search engine. Especially for docs. Options
> >
> > 1) Do we run our own?
> >
> > 2) Do we use google.
> >
> > I love 2,
On Jan 30, 2008, at 9:57 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
We need a Fedora search engine. Especially for docs. Options
1) Do we run our own?
Definitely.
2) Do we use google.
No, I think it should be OSS.
At OSU our web group uses Nutch with pretty good results. And you
don't have to us
Jonathan Steffan wrote:
> I have. I'd recommend using datapark search[1]. There is also the
> xapian[2] but it will need a robot to do the crawling (it has the Omega
> indexer, but that is designed for local data.) I've got some python code
> started, but it's not ready for production. htdig can be
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 13:21 -0500, Luke Macken wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:57:23AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > We need a Fedora search engine. Especially for docs. Options
> >
> > 1) Do we run our own?
> >
> > 2) Do we use google.
> >
>
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 12:34 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Luke Macken wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:57:23AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > We need a Fedora search engine. Especially for docs. Options
> > >
> > > 1) Do w
Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote:
> Jonathan Steffan wrote:
>> I have. I'd recommend using datapark search[1]. There is also the
>> xapian[2] but it will need a robot to do the crawling (it has the Omega
>> indexer, but that is designed for local data.) I've got some python code
>> started, but it's not re
Mike McGrath wrote:
> We need a Fedora search engine. Especially for docs. Options
With whatever solution we find, I'd be willing to look at setting up a
"livesearch" like interface:
In plone:
http://svn.plone.org/svn/plone/CMFPlone/branches/3.0/skins/plone_scripts/livesear
In the meantime, you can search many parts of the Fedora/Red Hat world
with Firefox search plugins.
http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/firefox
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/
Another option is:
http://rollyo.com/
--
Jonathan Steffan
daMaestro
GPG Fingerprint: 93A2 3E2F DC26 5570 3472 5B16 AD12 6CE7 0D86 AF59
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/lis
13 matches
Mail list logo
