On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 14:25 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, James Laska wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 15:57 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, James Laska wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 13:10 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > > > > * Should
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, James Laska wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 15:57 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, James Laska wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 13:10 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > > > * Should the semantic performance impact be significant, is
> > > > >
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 15:57 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, James Laska wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 13:10 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > > * Should the semantic performance impact be significant, is
> > > > hosting a separate Fedora QA mediawiki (with semant
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, James Laska wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 13:10 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > * Should the semantic performance impact be significant, is
> > > hosting a separate Fedora QA mediawiki (with semantic
> > enabled) a
> > > possibility?
> > >
> >
> > That i
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 13:10 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > * Should the semantic performance impact be significant, is
> > hosting a separate Fedora QA mediawiki (with semantic
> enabled) a
> > possibility?
> >
>
> That is possible, for example we have a smolt wiki seperate f
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, James Laska wrote:
>
> I'm in the process of setting up a private mediawiki+semantic instance
> as a proof of concept. But a few questions for the infrastructure
> team ...
>
> * I'm curious if others in fedora-infrastructure@ have experience
> with the semantic e
Greetings,
As you may know, the Fedora QA plans and tracks test execution against
Fedora milestones using the wiki. While the wiki has proven quite
valuable for content-driven test documentation (e.g. test plans and test
cases), recording test results has it's drawbacks.
First, in our current im
