On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:09:20 -0500 (CDT)
Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote:
Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or
something
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:49:47 -0500 (CDT)
Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:09:20 -0500 (CDT)
Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ricky Zhou
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:07:41 -0400
Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second, Fedora Applications/Amber is eventually going to need an
actual production server ready around the Fedora 10 release date.
I'd like to get to the point where I can make a formal request for
aforementioned
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 13:23 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:07:41 -0400
Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second, Fedora Applications/Amber is eventually going to need an
actual production server ready around the
On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote:
Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or something
like that, hopefully I'll be back later today/tomorrow to help if
needed.
If it requires auth, we'll probably want it at admin.fedoraproject.org
so that it can share cookies
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote:
Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or something
like that, hopefully I'll be back later today/tomorrow to help if
needed.
If it requires auth, we'll probably want it at
On 2008-08-12 08:09:20 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
it is probably time to better describe what goes where and why. I'm fond
of the admin.fedoraproject.org/blah/ for stuff. But if this is an
application that end users will be using that doesn't seem quite right.
Hmm, I wonder if this could lead
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:09:20 -0500 (CDT)
Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote:
Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or
something like that, hopefully I'll be back later
Hi,
So sometime next week I'd like to link to the
publictest10.fedoraproject.org/amber site and ask for feedback. In the
meantime I'm going to install the latest changes on it, and load it up
with all the data from F9. Just a heads-up, and a humble request not
to break things (like the FAS
