On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:04:08AM -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> Hopefully we have 2.4 as the minimum version. I'm pretty sure 2.4 is
> ubiquitous
> even on the enterprise-y distributions, but if we need older, we can try for
> that as well.
>
Just a note. If you're targeting RHEL/CentOS4 as you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mike McLean wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> On Sunday 25 October 2009 06:26:49 pm Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>>> And koji.fedoraproject.org, no?
>> koji is a mod_python app. it doesnt run as a daemon at all.
>> b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 05:08:03PM -0400, Mike McLean wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>
>> The daemon distinction might be wrong thing to fixate on here. There
>> is nothing in that disti
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 05:08:03PM -0400, Mike McLean wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> The daemon distinction might be wrong thing to fixate on here. There
> is nothing in that distinction that should exclude python (or most any
> language). I think the real fa
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Sunday 25 October 2009 06:26:49 pm Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>> And koji.fedoraproject.org, no?
> koji is a mod_python app. it doesnt run as a daemon at all.
> but it it all python.
There are python daemons in the system though. The bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:46:05PM -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
>> Seeing as it is a mirroring daemon, the network is the bottleneck. If it
isn't
>> then either you're sitting next door, our implementation is bad, or the
>> h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:46:05PM -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
>> > Seeing as it is a mirroring daemon, the network is the bottleneck. If it
isn't
>> > then either you're sitting
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:46:05PM -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> > Seeing as it is a mirroring daemon, the network is the bottleneck. If it
> > isn't
> > then either you're sitting next door, our implementation is bad, or the
> > hardware shouldn't be a
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:46:05PM -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> Seeing as it is a mirroring daemon, the network is the bottleneck. If it
> isn't
> then either you're sitting next door, our implementation is bad, or the
> hardware shouldn't be a mirror in the first place.
Speaking from experience
On Sunday 25 October 2009 06:26:49 pm Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> On 10/25/2009 11:51 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > With all my babbling I forgot to mention we do already run python daemons
> > in Fedora Infrastructure. Func is one, TurboGears (though it's wrapped
> > in mod_wsgi) and one that we wr
On 10/26/2009 12:37 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 10/25/2009 11:51 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
With all my babbling I forgot to mention we do already run python daemons
in Fedora Infrastructure. Func is one, TurboGears (though it's wrapped in
mod_wsgi)
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> On 10/25/2009 11:51 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > With all my babbling I forgot to mention we do already run python daemons
> > in Fedora Infrastructure. Func is one, TurboGears (though it's wrapped in
> > mod_wsgi) and one that we wrote ourselves[1]
On 10/25/2009 11:51 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
With all my babbling I forgot to mention we do already run python daemons
in Fedora Infrastructure. Func is one, TurboGears (though it's wrapped in
mod_wsgi) and one that we wrote ourselves[1] is our mirrorlist server.
It's the backend that powers:
ht
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:14:14PM -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> My team and I would like to know whether the community would be accepting of
> such a project (which includes a daemon) if it were written in Python rather
> than C or C++.
No problems here, MirrorManager includes several daemon proces
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 25 Oct 2009, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> >
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA256
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am working on a project designed to mirror large
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009, Ben Boeckel wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am working on a project designed to mirror large, changing archives of
>> software in a manner that ensures data
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi,
>
> I am working on a project designed to mirror large, changing archives of
> software in a manner that ensures data integrity and atomic updates using a
> peer-to-peer protocol.
>
> My team and I
17 matches
Mail list logo
