Re: Request for test data based off of obfuscated live data

2008-11-19 Thread John Palmieri
- "Toshio Kuratomi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John Palmieri wrote: > > - "Toshio Kuratomi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > A note on the code drop, by requiring the author to modify a spec > file if needed in order to deploy their changes into their environment > (revision numbers w

Re: Request for test data based off of obfuscated live data

2008-11-19 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
John Palmieri wrote: > - "Toshio Kuratomi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If we can munge the data enough to be comfortable releasing it to the >> public, it seems like that would cost us less man hours. However, it >> isn't entirely free. We'd still have to make new dumps of data, >> modify >

Re: Request for test data based off of obfuscated live data

2008-11-19 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
John Palmieri wrote: > - "Toshio Kuratomi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Getting koji data munged and transferred may be a problem as it is >> just >> so darn big. If we don't have to make changes to the data in koji, >> just >> get it distributed, then we could give access to a backup..

Re: Request for test data based off of obfuscated live data

2008-11-19 Thread John Palmieri
- "Toshio Kuratomi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike McGrath wrote: > > We're actually in a pretty unique situation in that most of our data > is > > public anyway, replicating pkgdb and bodhi data for example should > be > > fairly easy. Replicating the fas stuff should be easy too. > >

Re: Request for test data based off of obfuscated live data

2008-11-19 Thread John Palmieri
- "Toshio Kuratomi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Getting koji data munged and transferred may be a problem as it is > just > so darn big. If we don't have to make changes to the data in koji, > just > get it distributed, then we could give access to a backup... but > that's > still a l

Re: Request for test data based off of obfuscated live data

2008-11-18 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
Mike McGrath wrote: > On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, John Palmieri wrote: > >> Hey guys, >> >> On IRC the other day there was a discussion where I had requested the >> ability to use live data stripped of all personal identification and data, >> for creating a test bed for development of MyFedora. It was

Re: Request for test data based off of obfuscated live data

2008-11-18 Thread Mike McGrath
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > Getting koji data munged and transferred may be a problem as it is just > so darn big. If we don't have to make changes to the data in koji, just > get it distributed, then we could give access to a backup... but that's > still a lot of information t

Re: Request for test data based off of obfuscated live data

2008-11-18 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
John Palmieri wrote: > Hey guys, > > On IRC the other day there was a discussion where I had requested the ability > to use live data stripped of all personal identification and data, for > creating a test bed for development of MyFedora. It was asked I write up a > reason for needing this dat

Re: Request for test data based off of obfuscated live data

2008-11-18 Thread Mike McGrath
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, John Palmieri wrote: > Hey guys, > > On IRC the other day there was a discussion where I had requested the ability > to use live data stripped of all personal identification and data, for > creating a test bed for development of MyFedora. It was asked I write up a > reason

Request for test data based off of obfuscated live data

2008-11-18 Thread John Palmieri
Hey guys, On IRC the other day there was a discussion where I had requested the ability to use live data stripped of all personal identification and data, for creating a test bed for development of MyFedora. It was asked I write up a reason for needing this data as it was hard to explain in de