Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Nigel Jones wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 01:59 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Nigel Jones wrote:
IIRC the GPL at least requires that the code be kept for 3 years (hence
why we can't clean the look-a-side cache from memory).
AFAIK that only goes to /distribution/
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Given that we alone can think of a couple of arguments for or against
GPL distribution for 3 years or not, and there's other licenses as well,
this might be more appropriately handled by the legally literate people
(no offense to you, I just know I certainly am not)
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Given that we alone can think of a couple of arguments for or against
GPL distribution for 3 years or not, and there's other licenses as well,
this might be more appropriately handled by the legally literate people
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 09:43:29AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Given that we alone can think of a couple of arguments for or against
GPL distribution for 3 years or not, and there's other licenses as well,
this might be more appropriately handled by the
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 13:36 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
Whomever distributes the binaries is responsible for ensuring source
is available, either concurrently (ideally)(such as GPLv2 3a), or via
offer-to-provide-source-on-media (GPLv2 3b).
If binaries are not distributed from fedorahosted,
Getting back to this. What should we do with code to which no one claims
ownership or the owner cannot be found?
-Mike
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
Mike McGrath wrote:
Getting back to this. What should we do with code to which no one claims
ownership or the owner cannot be found?
Has something like an AWOL procedure been considered?
-Jeroen
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Mike McGrath wrote:
Getting back to this. What should we do with code to which no one claims
ownership or the owner cannot be found?
Has something like an AWOL procedure been considered?
Not really, thats kind of what I'm probing about.
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 16:53 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Mike McGrath wrote:
Getting back to this. What should we do with code to which no one claims
ownership or the owner cannot be found?
Has something like an AWOL procedure been
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Brett Lentz wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 16:53 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Mike McGrath wrote:
Getting back to this. What should we do with code to which no one
claims
ownership or the owner cannot be found?
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 13:58 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Getting back to this. What should we do with code to which no one claims
ownership or the owner cannot be found?
* Make Trac Read Only (maybe static content too, in
old.fedorahosted.org/projectname/)
* Disable commit group in FAS (in
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 18:14 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Brett Lentz wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 16:53 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Mike McGrath wrote:
Getting back to this. What should we do with code to which
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 18:43 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Nigel Jones wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 13:58 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Getting back to this. What should we do with code to which no one claims
ownership or the owner cannot be found?
* Make Trac Read Only
Nigel Jones wrote:
IIRC the GPL at least requires that the code be kept for 3 years (hence
why we can't clean the look-a-side cache from memory).
AFAIK that only goes to /distribution/ under GPLv2 section 3b, not the
upstream SCM, but then again I'm not sure and it may be worthwhile
looking
Mike McGrath wrote:
For how long? Here's the concern. At some point between now and the end
of time decisions are going to have to be made about these projects. I'm
trying to have us learn a lesson from the elvis move as well trying to
make sure other's lack of planning doesn't become
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 01:59 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Nigel Jones wrote:
IIRC the GPL at least requires that the code be kept for 3 years (hence
why we can't clean the look-a-side cache from memory).
AFAIK that only goes to /distribution/ under GPLv2 section 3b, not the
16 matches
Mail list logo