Hi,
I saw that some people are using CVS again, so I tried as well, but I
got:
[EMAIL PROTECTED](1012):/home/.../smart/devel$ cvs up
Permission denied (publickey).
cvs [update aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any)
I have a new FAS password, all certs updated, I even c
2008/8/23 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I saw that some people are using CVS again, so I tried as well, but I
> got:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED](1012):/home/.../smart/devel$ cvs up
> Permission denied (publickey).
> cvs [update aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any)
>
> I
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:06:07PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> 2008/8/23 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I saw that some people are using CVS again, so I tried as well, but I
> > got:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED](1012):/home/.../smart/devel$ cvs up
> > Permission denied (publickey).
> > cvs
2008/8/23 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:06:07PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>> 2008/8/23 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >
>> > I saw that some people are using CVS again, so I tried as well, but I
>> > got:
>> >
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED](1012):/home/.../smart/devel$
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Jeffrey Ollie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/8/23 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:06:07PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>>> 2008/8/23 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> >
>>> > I saw that some people are using CVS again, so I tried as
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are several mathematical weaknesses in DSA keys that were
> outlined during the OpenSSL problems. I believe the main one is that
> the DSA signature can give away the private key.
I've heard that too, but I
On Sat August 23 2008, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> 2008/8/23 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Have DSA keys now been banned?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Why?
>
> The primary reason is that it's nearly impossible to tell if the key
> was generated on a Debian system with the compromised OpenSSL
This is also true
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:37:13PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> 2008/8/23 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:06:07PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> >> 2008/8/23 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> >
> >> > I saw that some people are using CVS again, so I tried as well,
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:37:13PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> > The primary reason is that it's nearly impossible to tell if the key
> > was generated on a Debian system with the compromised OpenSSL
> > versions.
OK, I checked and it is far from impossible. After all the bug was
that there ar
2008/8/24 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:37:13PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>> 2008/8/23 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:06:07PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>> >> 2008/8/23 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >> >
>> >> > I saw that some
2008/8/24 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 04:37:13PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>> > The primary reason is that it's nearly impossible to tell if the key
>> > was generated on a Debian system with the compromised OpenSSL
>> > versions.
>
> OK, I checked and it is far fro
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 09:34:36AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >> >* ssh_key: Error - Not a valid RSA SSH key: ssh-dss ...
> >> >
> >> > Have DSA keys now been banned?
> >>
> >> Yes.
> >>
> >> > Why?
> >>
> >> The primary reason is that it's nearly impossible to tell if the key
> >> wa
2008/8/24 Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 09:34:36AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> >> >* ssh_key: Error - Not a valid RSA SSH key: ssh-dss ...
>> >> >
>> >> > Have DSA keys now been banned?
>> >>
>> >> Yes.
>> >>
>> >> > Why?
>> >>
>> >> The primary reason is t
13 matches
Mail list logo
