On Thu, 10 May 2007 10:18:56 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > machine. Who decides on what packages from that mysterious private repo
> > are "supported" on that machine or not? Seth?
> >
> Anyone with admin access to that box. If someone wants to install the
> RPM on that box and make sure it
On Thu, 10 May 2007 12:26:43 -0500 (CDT), Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Other than w3c validation failing nothing is broken. an end user goes to
> view the repoview pages they see the correct thing.
That's far from a good reason to not fix it nevertheless. Afterall, part
of the development includes m
On Thu, 10 May 2007 09:19:05 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > Get someone upstream (RHEL) to accept the package changes. buildsys
> > is going away in days anyway after koji goes live.
>
> It's bad form to ignore one person and ask the same of others.
Are you kidding?
Who ignores you? Here is t
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2007 09:40:50 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
What risk? Where can I read about that? Dennis has not replied to my
public mail either.
Currently, repoview is the only package that requires python-kid on that
machine. Who decides on what packages from that
On Thu, 10 May 2007 09:40:50 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > When I used a local copy of Yum 2.6.x to get something done, I was flamed.
> > When I ask for an official update of an installed rpm, I need a lot
> > of energy to run against closed doors.
> >
>
> You weren't flamed, you were denied.
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2007 09:14:41 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:23:31 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Why is it so damned difficult to get a single package updated although
I even provided the prepared rpms? This is turning into a negative
experience
On Thu, 10 May 2007 09:14:41 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:23:31 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> >
> > Why is it so damned difficult to get a single package updated although
> > I even provided the prepared rpms? This is turning into a negative
> > experience for me.
Mike McGrath wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:02:20 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:47:20 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:08:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
$ rpm -q python-kid
pyt
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:23:31 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Why is it so damned difficult to get a single package updated although
I even provided the prepared rpms? This is turning into a negative
experience for me.
Oh I don't know
1) Its not actually causing pr
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:23:31 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > So, what is the formal procedure for requesting a package update on the
> > > buildsys server like described above and getting an official and final
> > > reply?
> > >
> > Get someone upstream (RHEL) to accept the package changes.
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 09:32:03 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:02:20 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:47:20 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >>>
> On Thu, 15 Mar
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:02:20 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:47:20 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:08:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
$ rpm -q python-kid
python-kid-0.9-2.ce
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:02:20 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:47:20 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> > Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:08:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> $ rpm -q python-kid
> > >> python-kid-0.9-2.centos4
> > >>
>
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:47:20 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:08:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> >
> >> $ rpm -q python-kid
> >> python-kid-0.9-2.centos4
> >>
> >> on buildsys.fedoraproject.org would benefit from an update to 0.9.5 which
>
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:08:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
$ rpm -q python-kid
python-kid-0.9-2.centos4
on buildsys.fedoraproject.org would benefit from an update to 0.9.5 which
includes xml related fixes and makes it possible to create pages that
don't fail in the
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:08:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> $ rpm -q python-kid
> python-kid-0.9-2.centos4
>
> on buildsys.fedoraproject.org would benefit from an update to 0.9.5 which
> includes xml related fixes and makes it possible to create pages that
> don't fail in the w3c validator.
>
$ rpm -q python-kid
python-kid-0.9-2.centos4
on buildsys.fedoraproject.org would benefit from an update to 0.9.5 which
includes xml related fixes and makes it possible to create pages that
don't fail in the w3c validator.
$ rpm -q --whatrequires python-kid
repoview-0.5.1-1.centos4
__
17 matches
Mail list logo
