staging environment discussion

2008-09-05 Thread Mike McGrath
So as many of you have seen in the commits lists, the staging environment is coming along and getting built. I've hit a policy issue and so I thought instead of just doing this in a black hole. I'd discuss it. The way I see it there are two ways to do staging environments. For those of you unfa

Re: staging environment discussion

2008-09-05 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Mike McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So as many of you have seen in the commits lists, the staging environment > is coming along and getting built. I've hit a policy issue and so I > thought instead of just doing this in a black hole. I'd discuss it. > > The w

Re: staging environment discussion

2008-09-05 Thread Mike McGrath
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > there is also a combination of #1 and #2. Basically you have to create > 3-4 separate network topologies (this is where you have different > configs), and maybe have your bastion/proxy systems different. > >NameNetwork > Netw

Re: staging environment discussion

2008-09-05 Thread Daniel Drown
On Fri, 05 Sep 2008, Mike McGrath wrote: > So as many of you have seen in the commits lists, the staging environment > is coming along and getting built. I've hit a policy issue and so I > thought instead of just doing this in a black hole. I'd discuss it. > > The way I see it there are two ways