On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 17:23 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 01:47:55PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I'd say let F7 testing iron out 2.6.21 for a while before deciding about
> > FC6. We should be in the part of freeze where serious Fedora weenies are
> > doing a lot of tes
On 18.04.2007 23:23, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 01:47:55PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I'd say let F7 testing iron out 2.6.21 for a while before deciding about
> FC6. We should be in the part of freeze where serious Fedora weenies are
> doing a lot of testing.
Getting 2.6.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 01:47:55PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I'd say let F7 testing iron out 2.6.21 for a while before deciding about
> FC6. We should be in the part of freeze where serious Fedora weenies are
> doing a lot of testing.
Getting 2.6.21 into FC6 does also have the additional
I'd say let F7 testing iron out 2.6.21 for a while before deciding about
FC6. We should be in the part of freeze where serious Fedora weenies are
doing a lot of testing.
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redha
The number of bugs reported against the FC6 kernel is now dropping.
Should we move to kernel 2.6.21 and risk a whole new wave of bug reports,
or leave it on 2.6.20 and live with the fact that some things can't/won't
be fixed right, like support for PCI message signaled interrupts?
___
