Re: kqemu inclusion in kernel

2007-08-02 Thread dragoran
On 6/16/07, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 03:13:56PM +0100, Chris Brown wrote: I've started playing around with virtualization at work and the first thing I'd like to query is kqemu's lack of inclusion in the Fedora kernel. It was GPL'd in February and

Re: kqemu inclusion in kernel

2007-08-02 Thread Jarod Wilson
Chuck Ebbert wrote: On 08/02/2007 02:20 PM, dragoran wrote: well but kqemu seems not to break that often I just recompile it after each kernel release and it just works. the code might be big but it does not depend on (fast) changing interfaces. Maybe I missed the earlier discussions, but

Re: kqemu inclusion in kernel

2007-08-02 Thread Chuck Ebbert
On 08/02/2007 02:20 PM, dragoran wrote: well but kqemu seems not to break that often I just recompile it after each kernel release and it just works. the code might be big but it does not depend on (fast) changing interfaces. Maybe I missed the earlier discussions, but just what does kqemu

Re: kqemu inclusion in kernel

2007-08-02 Thread dragoran
On 8/2/07, Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 08/02/2007 02:20 PM, dragoran wrote: well but kqemu seems not to break that often I just recompile it after each kernel release and it just works. the code might be big but it does not depend on (fast) changing interfaces. Maybe I

Re: kqemu inclusion in kernel

2007-08-02 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 08:20:26PM +0200, dragoran wrote: On 6/16/07, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 03:13:56PM +0100, Chris Brown wrote: I've started playing around with virtualization at work and the first thing I'd like to query is kqemu's lack