On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:50:23PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > On 10/23/2007 06:28 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> >> > Are the addresses in System.map accurate? On the F7 2.6.23 kernel,
> >> > I had to subtract 0x40 and add 0x100 to the address in an
> >> > oops me
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 06:35:31PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 10/23/2007 06:28 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > Are the addresses in System.map accurate? On the F7 2.6.23 kernel,
> > > I had to subtract 0x40 and add 0x100 to the address in an
> > > oops message to get an address to u
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 10/23/2007 06:28 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> Are the addresses in System.map accurate? On the F7 2.6.23 kernel,
> I had to subtract 0x40 and add 0x100 to the address in an
> oops message to get an address to use with eu-addr2line.
Relocatable kernel is another thin
On 10/23/2007 06:28 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Are the addresses in System.map accurate? On the F7 2.6.23 kernel,
> > I had to subtract 0x40 and add 0x100 to the address in an
> > oops message to get an address to use with eu-addr2line.
>
> Relocatable kernel is another thing that really
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 06:26:21PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 10/23/2007 09:05 AM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > The systemtap folks are interested in having System.map installed by
> > kernel-devel, not just by the kernel rpm itself. This makes it possible to
> > do more preparations off-lin
On 10/23/2007 09:05 AM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> The systemtap folks are interested in having System.map installed by
> kernel-devel, not just by the kernel rpm itself. This makes it possible to
> do more preparations off-line for a kernel other than an installed one.
>
> Without objection, I'll c
The systemtap folks are interested in having System.map installed by
kernel-devel, not just by the kernel rpm itself. This makes it possible to
do more preparations off-line for a kernel other than an installed one.
Without objection, I'll check this in on all branches.
Thanks,
Roland
Index: k