On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 08:15 -0500, Build System wrote:
> kernel-2.6.24-0.61.rc3.git5.fc9
> ---
> * Fri Nov 30 2007 Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> - Oops! Local make-build-go-faster kernel.spec patch slipped in,
> reverted.
cat > GNUmakefile << EOF
ppc ppc64 i686
Hi,
I just finished removing the sysprof-kmod package from CVS as mandated
by the new guidelines for F9 and above.
I am now seeking some help to understand what is needed to have again
the kernel module required for proper operations of the sysprof
package.
Upstream sources are at:
http://www.dai
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:02:23AM +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> Hi,
> I just finished removing the sysprof-kmod package from CVS as mandated
> by the new guidelines for F9 and above.
>
> I am now seeking some help to understand what is needed to have again
> the kernel module required for
On Dec 2, 2007 1:09 AM, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:02:23AM +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I just finished removing the sysprof-kmod package from CVS as mandated
> > by the new guidelines for F9 and above.
> >
> > I am now seeking some help t
On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 19:09 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:02:23AM +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I just finished removing the sysprof-kmod package from CVS as mandated
> > by the new guidelines for F9 and above.
> >
> > I am now seeking some help to underst
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 02:04:01AM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> > > Upstream sources are at:
> > > http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/sysprof/
> >
> > The upstream kernel is likely to eventually get support for
> > perfmon2 integrated, but this could really use more work.
> > It's been in
