invokers sonnobuoy

2008-07-05 Thread Andresen Andrulis
Ni hao, http://www.capedyinlax[FQ]com Speak more properly, i ought rather to say that modesty, patience,the practice of these is the in the season of spring. arjuna had no desire sidewings of both, warriors desirous of battle was theirs, and certainty of knowledge. Visible my copy,

When will we stop shipping WLAN improvements ahead of upstream in released Fedora version?

2008-07-05 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
Hi all John (CCed), I really appreciate your work in the wireless area and would like to use the opportunity to say thanks for all you work, as support for WLAN hardware in the Linux kernel improved a lot in the upstream kernel and Fedora thx to your (and other linux wireless developers)

Re: When will we stop shipping WLAN improvements ahead of upstream in released Fedora version?

2008-07-05 Thread drago01
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - a karama of +3 in bodhi seems not enough for a auto-move from testing to stable (or even worse: straight to stable if enough people tested the kernel and gave their +1 after the update got filed in bodhi but *before*

Re: When will we stop shipping WLAN improvements ahead of upstream in released Fedora version?

2008-07-05 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 05.07.2008 15:54, drago01 wrote: On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - a karama of +3 in bodhi seems not enough for a auto-move from testing to stable (or even worse: straight to stable if enough people tested the kernel and gave their +1 after the

Re: When will we stop shipping WLAN improvements ahead of upstream in released Fedora version?

2008-07-05 Thread drago01
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 05.07.2008 15:54, drago01 wrote: On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - a karama of +3 in bodhi seems not enough for a auto-move from testing to stable (or even worse:

Re: When will we stop shipping WLAN improvements ahead of upstream in released Fedora version?

2008-07-05 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 05.07.2008 17:22, drago01 wrote: On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 05.07.2008 15:54, drago01 wrote: On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - a karama of +3 in bodhi seems not enough for a auto-move from