On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 09:28:43PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > > And actually the options I'm really hoping for are KVM_GUEST and
> > > KVM_CLOCK -- sorry for my confusion and sloppy grep for "VIRT".
> >
> > Umm, they're also all enabled.
>
> $ grep KVM /boot/config-2.6.26-0.115.r
> > And actually the options I'm really hoping for are KVM_GUEST and
> > KVM_CLOCK -- sorry for my confusion and sloppy grep for "VIRT".
>
> Umm, they're also all enabled.
$ grep KVM /boot/config-2.6.26-0.115.rc9.git2.fc10.x86_64
CONFIG_HAVE_KVM=y
CONFIG_KVM=m
CONFIG_KVM_INTEL=m
CONFIG_KVM
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 08:25:31PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > I just tried the latest Fedora rawhide kernel
> > (2.6.26-0.115.rc9.git2.fc10.x86_64) in a kvm virtual machine, and I
> > noticed that it doesn't have all the paravirtual goodness available in
> > 2.6.26. The cost of settin
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 08:18:17PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried the latest Fedora rawhide kernel
> (2.6.26-0.115.rc9.git2.fc10.x86_64) in a kvm virtual machine, and I
> noticed that it doesn't have all the paravirtual goodness available in
> 2.6.26. The cost of setting
> I just tried the latest Fedora rawhide kernel
> (2.6.26-0.115.rc9.git2.fc10.x86_64) in a kvm virtual machine, and I
> noticed that it doesn't have all the paravirtual goodness available in
> 2.6.26. The cost of setting PARAVIRT, PARAVIRT_CLOCK and
> PARAVIRT_GUEST to 'y' is suposed to be pr
Hi,
I just tried the latest Fedora rawhide kernel
(2.6.26-0.115.rc9.git2.fc10.x86_64) in a kvm virtual machine, and I
noticed that it doesn't have all the paravirtual goodness available in
2.6.26. The cost of setting PARAVIRT, PARAVIRT_CLOCK and
PARAVIRT_GUEST to 'y' is suposed to be pretty minim
Hello everyone,
I noticed that you don't have the webcam driver for some of the hp and sony
notebooks. So I patched up the original code that was originally written by
Sam Revitch. If anyone would like to build the kernel with this driver then
follow the instructions below.
If you want to b
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:04:45AM -0700, Jason Newton wrote:
> Again, I'm a newbie but it seems that CONFIG_IWL4965_HT is present in
> both compat-wireless-2008-07-08 and vanilla 2.6.26-rc9 or am I not
> looking upstream enough
You are not.
--
John W. Linville
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
John W. Linville wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 06:48:11AM -0700, Jason Newton wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to this list and sort of to fedora so be gentle :-).
I bought myself a new 802.11n router since 2.6.25 and up now boast
802.11n functionality with iwl4965, a card I have in my t61p thinkpad,
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 06:48:11AM -0700, Jason Newton wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm new to this list and sort of to fedora so be gentle :-).
> I bought myself a new 802.11n router since 2.6.25 and up now boast
> 802.11n functionality with iwl4965, a card I have in my t61p thinkpad,
> but it seems CONFI
Hi all,
I'm new to this list and sort of to fedora so be gentle :-).
I bought myself a new 802.11n router since 2.6.25 and up now boast
802.11n functionality with iwl4965, a card I have in my t61p thinkpad,
but it seems CONFIG_IWL4965_HT and CONFIG_NETDEVICES_MULTIQUEUE are not
set in either 2.
11 matches
Mail list logo