On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 05:32:50PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
Content-Description: message body text
> The /proc/PID/coredump_filter mechanism makes it easy to tweak the
> per-process setting to control ELF core dump style details.
> This setting is per-process (per-mm) and inherited by chil
The /proc/PID/coredump_filter mechanism makes it easy to tweak the
per-process setting to control ELF core dump style details.
This setting is per-process (per-mm) and inherited by children.
But as a user, the /proc interface is insane. It prints a magical hex
value (without a leading 0x, to ma
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 12:13 -0700, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> See various and sundry plumber's conf discussions.
>
> Comments? (The netfilter stuff needs further investigation.)
I'm ok with all of these specific config changes, but I'd like to repeat
what I said in Kyle's session about demodularisi
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 03:07:04PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Dave Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > linux-2.6-defaults-fat-utf8.patch
> >Drop?
>
> Isn't this a local choice similar to the later ones?
The problem is this is a "who do we want to screw over" patch.
Some people have
Dave Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> linux-2.6-defaults-fat-utf8.patch
> Drop?
Isn't this a local choice similar to the later ones?
> linux-2.6-net-silence-noisy-printks.patch
> linux-2.6-piix3-silence-quirk.patch
> linux-2.6-quiet-iommu.patch
> linux-2.6-silence-acpi-blacklist.patch
> l
I just sifted through what we had in rawhide, after noticing that
ls *.patch was starting to scroll my terminal (which is never a good sign).
In doing so, I found a bunch of patches that weren't applied any more
that we forgot to remove, and a bunch that were applied that shouldn't
have been.
Sifti
We've had this in Fedora since 2007/02/27
Can anyone recall why? and more importantly, why it isn't upstream?
Dave
--- linux-2.6.20/arch/ia64/kernel/quirks.c 1969-12-31 19:00:00.0
-0500
+++ linux-2.6.20_fix/arch/ia64/kernel/quirks.c 2007-02-13 13:56:34.0
-0500
@@
