On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 16:40 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 04:33:22PM -0400, Doug Chapman wrote:
> > Back in the F9 timeframe we had recommended that
> > CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y be set for the ia64 config. It appears that
> > recent anaconda changes
Back in the F9 timeframe we had recommended that
CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y be set for the ia64 config. It appears that
recent anaconda changes no longer work at all with that set.
Can we get this removed? It was set only for ia64 so it will have no
affect on other arches.
thanks,
- Doug
broken on any system where the pageszie is larger than either
the block size of the squashfs image or larger than the metadata size (8192).
This is easily fixed by ensuring cache->pages is always > 0.
Signed-off-by: Doug Chapman
Cc: Phillip Lougher
---
diff --git a/fs/squashfs/cache.c b/fs/sq
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 12:28 -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
> Doug Chapman wrote:
> > This patch has been submitted upstream but I don't know if it will get
> > pulled in to Fedora through the normal channels prior to F10 or not.
> > Without this patch Fedora 10 wi
This patch has been submitted upstream but I don't know if it will get
pulled in to Fedora through the normal channels prior to F10 or not.
Without this patch Fedora 10 will not install on cciss which breaks
nearly all HP server systems.
thanks,
- Doug
--- Begin Message ---
Patch 1 of 1
This pa
Sometime leading up to the F9 kernel my very large ia64 system (64 cpu
1TB ram, bunch of PCI busses and I/O) fails to boot. It appears to be
something in how nash/mkinitrd gets information from sysfs. Since this
is an early boot-time issue and nash isn't very easy to debug I am
having trouble get
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 13:28 -0400, Doug Chapman wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 13:16 -0400, Doug Chapman wrote:
> > Roland,
> >
> > The latest incarnation of the utrace patch breaks the kernel build on
> > ia64:
> >
> > arch/ia64/kernel/process.c: In fun
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 13:16 -0400, Doug Chapman wrote:
> Roland,
>
> The latest incarnation of the utrace patch breaks the kernel build on
> ia64:
>
> arch/ia64/kernel/process.c: In function 'do_notify_resume_user':
> arch/ia64/kernel/process.c:189: error: i
Roland,
The latest incarnation of the utrace patch breaks the kernel build on
ia64:
arch/ia64/kernel/process.c: In function 'do_notify_resume_user':
arch/ia64/kernel/process.c:189: error: implicit declaration of function
'tracehook_notify_resume'
Full build log can be found here:
http://ia64.k
. This breaks building with CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING
and CONFIG_KVM=m.
Signed-off-by: Doug Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Hidetoshi Seto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/time.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/time.c
index 8c73643..aad1b7b 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/time.
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 12:19 -0400, Doug Chapman wrote:
> This is an odd one which I will continue to try to debug.
>
> A recent change added CONFIG_MAC80211_MESH to the fedora kernel. Oddly
> this causes gcc to hang when building net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c. I
> originally susp
This is an odd one which I will continue to try to debug.
A recent change added CONFIG_MAC80211_MESH to the fedora kernel. Oddly
this causes gcc to hang when building net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c. I
originally suspected a gcc-4.3 bug but I then reproduced this on RHEL5
with gcc-4.1.2.
This cod
As discussed in another thread the utrace support for ia64 is not
complete upstream yet. The current utrace patch breaks building on
ia64. To allow us to continue progress on ia64 can we apply this patch
until these issues are resolved?
thanks,
- Doug
*** kernel.spec.bad 2008-04-01 10:37:2
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 14:35 -0400, Doug Chapman wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 13:40 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I've put the 2.6.25 rebase of utrace back in and kicked off a build.
> > I'll pick up the pieces if it comes out all broken.
> > (It already did, c
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 13:40 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I've put the 2.6.25 rebase of utrace back in and kicked off a build.
> I'll pick up the pieces if it comes out all broken.
> (It already did, cause I forgot to test the ppc32 build upstream.)
>
> For the moment it's applied as one big pat
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 11:36 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:16:00AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:00:32PM -0500, Doug Chapman wrote:
> > > Actually I came up with what I think is a cleaner fix for this. Since
> > >
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 16:03 -0500, Doug Chapman wrote:
> A recent kernel change has change the behavior of chmod on fat
> filesystems:
>
> commit 19c561a60ffe52df88dd63de0bff480ca094efe4
> Author: Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed Feb 6 01:36:08 2008 -0800
A recent kernel change has change the behavior of chmod on fat
filesystems:
commit 19c561a60ffe52df88dd63de0bff480ca094efe4
Author: Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed Feb 6 01:36:08 2008 -0800
fs/fat/: refine chmod checks
After this change rpm installs of kernels fail on ia64.
18 matches
Mail list logo