SSIA -- requesting here rather than building myself to assuage concerns
of overloading Koji...
John
--
John W. LinvilleLinux should be at the core
linvi...@redhat.com of your literate lifestyle.
___
Fedora-kernel
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 10:48:27AM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
SSIA -- requesting here rather than building myself to assuage concerns
of overloading Koji...
Sorry, got impatient...
--
John W. LinvilleLinux should be at the core
linvi...@redhat.com
hard panics requiring reboot within 1-2 minutes
of the wireless interface being enabled.
IIRC, it will take some porting for 2.6.27. Is there an F-10-2_6_27
fork somewhere?
John
--
John W. LinvilleLinux should be at the core
linvi...@redhat.com of your literate
ACK all the non-wireless bits! :-)
John
--
John W. Linville
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
or look in the srpm/cvs/etc to see what's changed.
This would just confuse user and is inconsistent with the rest of the
distro...
I presume the rpm command would still work, so I would see no harm
in adding the changelog as a %doc (if/when it is broken-out from the
spec file).
John
--
John W
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 05:05:33PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
John W. Linville wrote:
I still think that for continuity's sake f8 and f9 should continue
to get wireless fixes from 2.6.27. Those should only be specific
bug fixes (although I suppose there is still time for a new driver),
so
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 11:37:10AM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
So, here is what I propose:
-- continue the current practice until 2.6.26 is released and the
2.6.27 merge window closes;
-- after that, continue the current practice for updating rawhide; but,
-- once F9 (and presumably
?
John
--
John W. Linville
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:04:45AM -0700, Jason Newton wrote:
Again, I'm a newbie but it seems that CONFIG_IWL4965_HT is present in
both compat-wireless-2008-07-08 and vanilla 2.6.26-rc9 or am I not
looking upstream enough
You are not.
--
John W. Linville
[EMAIL PROTECTED
requirements. But they are all upstream material.
The only patch I've added to Fedora that does not meet this definition
is the one for the at76_usb driver, which is a special case. I'm happy
to discuss at76_usb separately if someone so wishes.
John
--
John W. Linville
[EMAIL PROTECTED
you are using an
HWADDR line in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1?
John
--
John W. Linville
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
11 matches
Mail list logo
