RE: Compiling kernel-2.6.30.5-43.fc11.src.rpm

2009-09-07 Thread Markus Kesaromous
> Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 18:17:38 -0400 > From: jwbo...@gmail.com > To: remotes...@live.com > CC: fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com > Subject: Re: Compiling kernel-2.6.30.5-43.fc11.src.rpm > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 02:27:24PM -0700, Ma

Compiling kernel-2.6.30.5-43.fc11.src.rpm

2009-09-07 Thread Markus Kesaromous
Still not fixed: arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c:63:7: warning: "__x86_64__" is not defined _ Get back to school stuff for them and cashback for you. http://www.bing.com/cashback?form=MSHYCB&publ=WLHMTAG&crea=TEXT_MSHYCB_BackToSchool_Cas

RE: Building kernel-2.6.31-0.190 rawhide in F11

2009-09-05 Thread Markus Kesaromous
t; From: pebo...@tiscali.nl >> To: remotes...@live.com >> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:38:44 +0200 >> CC: fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com >> Subject: Re: Building kernel-2.6.31-0.190 rawhide in F11 >> >> On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 22:08 -0700, Markus Kesaromous wrote: >

RE: Building kernel-2.6.31-0.190 rawhide in F11

2009-09-04 Thread Markus Kesaromous
> From: pebo...@tiscali.nl > To: remotes...@live.com > Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:38:44 +0200 > CC: fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com > Subject: Re: Building kernel-2.6.31-0.190 rawhide in F11 > > On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 22:08 -0700, Ma

Building kernel-2.6.31-0.190 rawhide in F11

2009-09-03 Thread Markus Kesaromous
Build, instal and boot went fine, except radeon driver does not work. Radeon works just fine in 2.6.29.6-217.2.16.fc11.i586, but not in 2.6.31-0.190... Here's /var/log/Xorg.0.log: X.Org X Server 1.6.1.901 (1.6.2 RC 1) Release Date: 2009-5-8 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating Syste

RE: F11 - vmlinuz-2.6.29.6-217.2.16.fc11.i586 does not boot

2009-09-02 Thread Markus Kesaromous
> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:45:50 +0200 > From: rolf.offerma...@gmx.net > To: fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com > CC: scha...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: F11 - vmlinuz-2.6.29.6-217.2.16.fc11.i586 does not boot > > Aioanei Rares wrote: >> On 08/28/2009 03:34 PM, Rolf Offermanns wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>>

Installing and running rawhide

2009-08-28 Thread Markus Kesaromous
_ Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=PID23391::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HYGN_faster:082009 ___ Fedora-kernel-list

RE: Release F11 stuck at 2.6.29 ???

2009-08-28 Thread Markus Kesaromous
> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:11:49 -0400 > From: jwbo...@gmail.com > To: remotes...@live.com > CC: fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com > Subject: Re: Release F11 stuck at 2.6.29 ??? > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 01:07:03PM -0700, Ma

Release F11 stuck at 2.6.29 ???

2009-08-28 Thread Markus Kesaromous
When will 2.6.30 and 2.6.31 be released as updates for F11 Why is F11 being kept at 2.6.29? That is what F11 was initially released at, and it is still stuck at this release? I would like to know if and when 2.6.3X will be released as an updated for F11. MK _

RE: rpmbuild warning message

2009-08-21 Thread Markus Kesaromous
> From: pebo...@tiscali.nl > To: remotes...@live.com > Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:30:46 +0200 > CC: fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com > Subject: Re: rpmbuild warning message > > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 22:21 -0700, Markus Kesaromous wrote:

rpmbuild warning message

2009-08-20 Thread Markus Kesaromous
In building 2.6.29..6-217.2.8.fc11 from source rpm for i586 architecture on a machine with amd athlon64 cpu, I get this warning message: arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c:63:7: warning: "__x86_64__" is not defined Thing is, I have no problems running i586 kernel, and even the resulting kernel runs fi

RE: Radeon driver broken in 2.6.31-0.125.4.2.rc5.git2.fc11

2009-08-15 Thread Markus Kesaromous
> Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:23:46 -0600 > From: zait...@redhat.com > To: remotes...@live.com > CC: fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com > Subject: Re: Radeon driver broken in 2.6.31-0.125.4.2.rc5.git2.fc11 > > On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 1

Radeon driver broken in 2.6.31-0.125.4.2.rc5.git2.fc11

2009-08-15 Thread Markus Kesaromous
I had no problems with the radeon drivers in 2.6.29.6-213 2.6.29.6-217.2.3 2.6.30.4-25 But in 2.6.31-0.125.4.2.rc5.git2, X is unable to start. This is Xorg.0.log: X.Org X Server 1.6.1.901 (1.6.2 RC 1) Release Date: 2009-5-8 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.

RE: Recompile kernel without SMP

2009-08-14 Thread Markus Kesaromous
> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:35:22 -0400 > From: pgrinb...@nyc.saic.com > To: fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com > Subject: Recompile kernel without SMP > > Hi there, > > I am trying to recompile kernel without SMP. So far I've been > unsuccessful. Meaning I am able to compile, but it was still SMP.. >

RE: (no subject)

2009-08-12 Thread Markus Kesaromous
> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:01:25 +0100 > Subject: Re: (no subject) > From: snecklif...@gmail.com > To: remotes...@live.com > > Hi Markus, > > 2009/8/12 Markus Kesaromous : >> >> Dear List, >> I searched the ath9k

(no subject)

2009-08-12 Thread Markus Kesaromous
Dear List, I searched the ath9k source directory /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/kernel-2.6.29/linux-2.6.29.i586/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k for any strings that would hint/suggest support for the Atheros 9220/9223 chipset. I saw no such strings. So, I emailed Atheros.com sales dept. and asked if they inten

RE: kernel 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11 compiled from source will not boot‏‏

2009-08-10 Thread Markus Kesaromous
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:41:52AM, Christopher Brown wrote: > Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:41:52 +0100 > From: snecklif...@gmail.com > To: remotes...@live.com > CC: fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com > Subject: Re: kernel 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11 compiled from source will not boot‏‏ >

kernel 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11 compil ed from source will not boot‏‏

2009-08-10 Thread Markus Kesaromous
Dear list, There is something seriously wrong with this kernel release. It compiles - but will not boot all the way. It hangs somewhere. I even tried to boot into single user mode. I never get to the shell prompt when booting in single user mode, nor to the gnome login banner when letting it boot