option, with it enabled as default?
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailma
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 06:35:19PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 04:27:50PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
>
> > This _is_ Fedora we're talking about, not RHEL, right? :-)
> > /me has had to replace way too many kernel modules from RHEL, which
> > c
apping modules into the extra space at the end of the
kernel's 2MB TLB entries, to get the same benefit?
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing li
. Basically anything that touches hardware
directly or one layer up. Not often, but enough that I like
modularity for this possibility. It has meant the difference between
being able to ship hardware, or not for another 6 months until new CDs
are spun...
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:31:29PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 March 2008 10:10:17 pm Matt Domsch wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:55:04AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427311
> > >
&g
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:55:04AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427311
>
> The kernel does not use CONFIG_MODULE_SRCVERSION_ALL=y, which prevents
> modules that don't use MODULE_VERSION() tags from getting a srcversion
> field in
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 02:13:56PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:50:46PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:42:49PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > >>>>> "PJ" == Peter Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
%endif
> +
> mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/modules/$KernelVer
> make -s ARCH=$Arch INSTALL_MOD_PATH=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT modules_install
> KERNELRELEASE=$KernelVer
> %ifarch %{vdso_arches}
There are systems with EFI32 and EFI64 out there, that aren't ia64,
but that wi
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:50:46PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:42:49PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > >>>>> "PJ" == Peter Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > PJ> That doesn't guarantee the right
,
Matt
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
s (on my
system) unload kernel modules.
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
need to do anything, can't you just trigger on kernel-devel installs?
no, because if DKMS decides it needs to call mkinitrd again, it needs
to have kernel installed. It really is a "both and please", hence
%posttrans gets us that.
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:13:35PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 12:01:23PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 12:54:29PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > Matt Domsch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > > > Use triggers -
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 12:54:29PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Matt Domsch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > Use triggers - this functionality already exists without kernel-specific
> > > infrastructure.
> >
> > a) LSB suggests triggers are evil.
>
>
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 12:45:05PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Matt Domsch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433121
> >
> > DKMS would like to have the opportunity to run it's
> > auto-rebuilder/installer after a n
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 12:35:19PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:53:26AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433121
> >
> > DKMS would like to have the opportunity to run it's
> > auto-rebuilder/inst
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 09:49:44AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 09:36:49AM -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 20:16 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > > is there any reason why we can't just move %post to %posttrans?
> >
> &
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 09:36:49AM -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 20:16 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > is there any reason why we can't just move %post to %posttrans?
>
> %posttrans breaks the way we do bootloader config updating as it leaves
> a
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 08:16:25PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> is there any reason why we can't just move %post to %posttrans?
two patches below, moving %post to %posttrans in the kernel packages
(not -devel of course), and implementing the hooks in new-kernel-pkg.
Thanks,
Matt
--
Mat
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 06:51:49PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 02:17:16PM -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 09:53 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > > DKMS would like to have the opportunity to run it's
> > > auto-rebuilder/inst
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 02:17:16PM -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 09:53 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > DKMS would like to have the opportunity to run it's
> > auto-rebuilder/installer after a new kernel RPM has been installed,
> > without having to wa
me or not. It would benefit from having
srcversion enabled for all modules. Ubuntu and openSUSE enable this
option.
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
___
Fedora-ke
ame to match so people can reuse their scriptlets.)
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
--- kernel.spec.orig2008-02-15 21:06:33.0 -0600
+++ kernel.spec 2008-02-16 00:07:36.0 -0600
@@ -1610,11 +1610,35 @@
%{nil}
23 matches
Mail list logo
