experimenting with v4, which is a good thing and something
I would like to promote by keeping the F-12 kernel
up to date with the latest stable code.
steved.
Date: Mon Dec 7 17:23:48 2009 -0500
Author: J. Bruce Fields bfie...@citi.umich.edu
Author: Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com
Update to latest
Does anybody know if so wiki or guidelines out there
that defines how kernel option should be classified?
Meaning what does it really means to be 'EXPERIMENTAL' or
'DEVELOPER ONLY'. Are there any criteria that has to
be met to change them or is simply up to the maintainer's
discretion?
tia,
On 08/17/2009 12:37 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:19:27PM -0400, William A. (Andy) Adamson wrote:
I think NFSv4.0 should be moved from EXPERIMENTAL before NFSv4.1 gets
moved from DEVELOPER - EXPERIMENTAL!
What is left to do in NFSv4.0 to allow this to happen?
Todo's
of the protocol including mounting...
In the end, this is the first major step toward making
NFS v4 the default protocol.
steved.
Date: Tue Jul 7, 2009
Author: Steve Dickson
Kernel support needed to implement dynamic pseudo root
support which will allow v3 and v2 exports accessible
to NFS v4 clients
Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 02:56:04PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
A while back, I believe back during the last FUDCon in Raleigh I talked with
kylem and davej about turning off the inline-functions-called-once which
inlines functions that are only called once. Turning off
Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 27 August 2008 12:48:41 Steve Dickson wrote:
Here is a patch that was posted a while back on lkml that does
indeed stop a OOPS I notice that is not in the latest rawhide
kernel... We might want to think about taking this one early due
to the obvious
Here is a patch that was posted a while back on lkml that does
indeed stop a OOPS I notice that is not in the latest rawhide
kernel... We might want to think about taking this one early due
to the obvious...
steved.
From: Denis V. Lunev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unfortunately,
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Steve Dickson wrote:
Now that devel kernels rpms require the kernel-firmware rpm, it makes
sense to me that one should be able to build both of them at the same
time. So this patch adds the --with firmware build option
which will allow kernel-firmware rpms to built
the --without vdso_install build option
which stop the VDSO binaries from being installed. This cuts
down the overall build time especially when you build over NFS
like I do..
Signed-Off-By: Steve Dickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -up SPECS/kernel.spec.orig SPECS/kernel.spec
--- SPECS/kernel.spec.orig 2008
even in the case when the exported
directory does not exist.
This patch maps the errors returned by the remote mountd into
valid errno values, exactly how it was done pre-string based
mounts. By returning the correct errno enables mount.nfs
to do the right thing.
Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson
even in the case when the exported
directory does not exist.
This patch maps the errors returned by the remote mountd into
valid errno values, exactly how it was done pre-string based
mounts. By returning the correct errno enables mount.nfs
to do the right thing.
Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson
even in the case when the exported
directory does not exist.
This patch maps the errors returned by the remote mountd into
valid errno values, exactly how it was done pre-string based
mounts. By returning the correct errno enables mount.nfs
to do the right thing.
Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson
Eric Paris wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 12:10 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
Does this mean the EACCES can/will again become fatal in mount.nfs like
it used to be?
EACCES is still a non-fatal error as it was...
I guess I didn't look back far enough...
non-fatal error as it was? Huh? Back
Any ideas?
ERROR: LGUEST_PAGES_guest_gdt_desc [drivers/lguest/lg.ko] undefined!
ERROR: LGUEST_PAGES_host_gdt_desc [drivers/lguest/lg.ko] undefined!
ERROR: LGUEST_PAGES_host_cr3 [drivers/lguest/lg.ko] undefined!
ERROR: LGUEST_PAGES_regs [drivers/lguest/lg.ko] undefined!
ERROR:
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 08/21/2007 12:14 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 10:29:53AM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
If people try mounting several exports from the same filesystem, it
fails
with confusing error messages if the mount options are different
15 matches
Mail list logo
