2009/9/13 Xose Vazquez Perez :
> hi,
>
> would it be possible to adapt the i386 distribucion
> to run also the x86_64 kernel ?
Why not just use a x86_64 userspace and kernel i.e x86_64 distro ?
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redh
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Markus Kesaromous wrote:
>
> When will 2.6.30 and 2.6.31 be released as updates for F11
> Why is F11 being kept at 2.6.29? That is what F11 was initially
> released at, and it is still stuck at this release?
>
> I would like to know if and when 2.6.3X will be r
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Ahmad Al-Yaman wrote:
> Thank you, I adjusted the config file as you recommended and the messages
> are gone. Where should I report this lockdep?
Depends on which kernel / patches do you use.
If it is a vanilla tarball then upstream (lkml / bugzilla.kernel.org)
if
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Ahmad Al-Yaman wrote:
> I was able to find out the messages that are displayed before plymouth
> starts, but I still have no idea what's causing them:
>
> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> 2.6.29.5-191.eeepc.fc11.i686.PAE #1
> -
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
>> dynamic PAE ?
>>
>
> Uh -- I can see how that is confusing :) Sorry, let me make another attempt
> at that.
I know what you mean by that but I have not seen any patches like that,
in fact I asked about it yesterday on IRC and was told t
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
>> Part of the problem with that idea is that the Pentium M laptops without
>> PAE
>> aren't that old. This might upset quite a few people.
>>
>>
>
> Right -- and that's a good point to keep in mind. IMO we shouldn't break
> *any* systems w
Currently we have:
CONFIG_SOUND_OSS_CORE=y
CONFIG_SND_OSSEMUL=y
CONFIG_SND_MIXER_OSS=m
CONFIG_SND_PCM_OSS=m
CONFIG_SND_PCM_OSS_PLUGINS=y
CONFIG_SND_SEQUENCER_OSS=y
this cause the OSS compat modules to be loaded on every system (that
has sound), even thought most people do not require this (pure o
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17.10.2008 16:10, Kyle McMartin wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:03:39AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 06:33:49AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
Anyone planning to respin the F-
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Jarod Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John W. Linville wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 07:43:49PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Jarod Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>&g
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Jarod Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We could also, if so desired, install the split-out changelog as a %doc
> file, the thought being that not everyone knows to look at 'rpm -q
> --changelog' output or look in the srpm/cvs/etc to see what's changed.
This woul
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 05.07.2008 15:54, drago01 wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> - a karama of "+3&quo
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - a karama of "+3" in bodhi seems not enough for a auto-move from testing to
> stable (or even worse: straight to stable if enough people tested the kernel
> and gave their +1 after the update got filed in bodhi but *be
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Richard Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 21:16 +0200, drago01 wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Richard Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > You really don't want to be using
>&g
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Richard Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You really don't want to be using
> USERSPACE at all.
seems like cpufreq-applet uses it
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat
On Feb 18, 2008 6:06 AM, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 09:08:02PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > On 02/16/2008 06:53 AM, drago01 wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I tested the kernel-2.6.24.2-3.fc8 (downloaded the x86_64 build
>
Hi,
While testing 2.6.24.2-3.fc8 on F8 I found many messages like this:
ALSA sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c:1259: azx_pcm_prepare: bufsize=0x4400,
fragsize=0x1100, format=0x11
ALSA sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.c:682: hda_codec_setup_stream: NID=0x7,
stream=0x5, channel=0, format=0x11
ALSA sound/pci/hda/hda_
Hi,
I tested the kernel-2.6.24.2-3.fc8 (downloaded the x86_64 build
directly) on my laptop.
Hal detects two batteries because it looks in sysfs and in procfs for
the battery info. I tryed to apply the patch from the hal-list which
causes hal to not look in procfs but in sysfs only when the sysf
Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Saturday 26 January 2008 05:19:14 am Roland McGrath wrote:
Is F-[78] going to stay on 2.6.23 for a while, or switch to 2.6.24 fairly
soon?
Chuck was talking about branching in cvs to start doing 2.6.24 builds for at
least F8 as soon as possible for people to tes
drago01 wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded kernel-2.6.23.14-113.fc8 from koji and wanted to boot it
on my NF4 SLI / Opteron 170 based box (x86_64) and the system reboots
immediately when booting this kernel.
I was using 2.6.23.12-99.fc8 before which is working fine.
I suspect that this "Se
Hi,
I downloaded kernel-2.6.23.14-113.fc8 from koji and wanted to boot it on
my NF4 SLI / Opteron 170 based box (x86_64) and the system reboots
immediately when booting this kernel.
I was using 2.6.23.12-99.fc8 before which is working fine.
I suspect that this "Set x86 CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START=0x
20 matches
Mail list logo
