2009/9/13 Xose Vazquez Perez xose.vazq...@gmail.com:
hi,
would it be possible to adapt the i386 distribucion
to run also the x86_64 kernel ?
Why not just use a x86_64 userspace and kernel i.e x86_64 distro ?
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Ahmad Al-Yamanahmad221...@yahoo.com wrote:
I was able to find out the messages that are displayed before plymouth
starts, but I still have no idea what's causing them:
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.29.5-191.eeepc.fc11.i686.PAE
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Ahmad Al-Yamanahmad221...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thank you, I adjusted the config file as you recommended and the messages
are gone. Where should I report this lockdep?
Depends on which kernel / patches do you use.
If it is a vanilla tarball then upstream (lkml /
Currently we have:
CONFIG_SOUND_OSS_CORE=y
CONFIG_SND_OSSEMUL=y
CONFIG_SND_MIXER_OSS=m
CONFIG_SND_PCM_OSS=m
CONFIG_SND_PCM_OSS_PLUGINS=y
CONFIG_SND_SEQUENCER_OSS=y
this cause the OSS compat modules to be loaded on every system (that
has sound), even thought most people do not require this (pure
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Prarit Bhargava pra...@redhat.com wrote:
Part of the problem with that idea is that the Pentium M laptops without
PAE
aren't that old. This might upset quite a few people.
Right -- and that's a good point to keep in mind. IMO we shouldn't break
*any*
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John W. Linville wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 07:43:49PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could also, if so desired, install the split-out changelog
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- a karama of +3 in bodhi seems not enough for a auto-move from testing to
stable (or even worse: straight to stable if enough people tested the kernel
and gave their +1 after the update got filed in bodhi but *before*
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05.07.2008 15:54, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- a karama of +3 in bodhi seems not enough for a auto-move from testing
to
stable (or even worse
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Richard Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You really don't want to be using
USERSPACE at all.
seems like cpufreq-applet uses it
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
On Feb 18, 2008 6:06 AM, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 09:08:02PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 02/16/2008 06:53 AM, drago01 wrote:
Hi,
I tested the kernel-2.6.24.2-3.fc8 (downloaded the x86_64 build
directly) on my laptop.
Hal detects two
Hi,
While testing 2.6.24.2-3.fc8 on F8 I found many messages like this:
ALSA sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c:1259: azx_pcm_prepare: bufsize=0x4400,
fragsize=0x1100, format=0x11
ALSA sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.c:682: hda_codec_setup_stream: NID=0x7,
stream=0x5, channel=0, format=0x11
ALSA
Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Saturday 26 January 2008 05:19:14 am Roland McGrath wrote:
Is F-[78] going to stay on 2.6.23 for a while, or switch to 2.6.24 fairly
soon?
Chuck was talking about branching in cvs to start doing 2.6.24 builds for at
least F8 as soon as possible for people to
drago01 wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded kernel-2.6.23.14-113.fc8 from koji and wanted to boot it
on my NF4 SLI / Opteron 170 based box (x86_64) and the system reboots
immediately when booting this kernel.
I was using 2.6.23.12-99.fc8 before which is working fine.
I suspect that this Set x86
13 matches
Mail list logo
