Re: [PATCH] build a 'full' package on i686

2009-07-22 Thread Quentin Armitage
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 18:48 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:27:40PM +0100, Quentin Armitage wrote: > > Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > The proposal to have the baseline be i686 + SSE2 was shot down; bare > > > i686 was approved. > > > > Does this mean that an i686 kernel w

Re: [PATCH] build a 'full' package on i686

2009-07-20 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:27:40PM +0100, Quentin Armitage wrote: > Bill Nottingham wrote: > > The proposal to have the baseline be i686 + SSE2 was shot down; bare > > i686 was approved. > > Does this mean that an i686 kernel without PAE will still be built (my > laptop processor does not h

Re: [PATCH] build a 'full' package on i686

2009-07-20 Thread Quentin Armitage
Bill Nottingham wrote: > The proposal to have the baseline be i686 + SSE2 was shot down; bare > i686 was approved. Does this mean that an i686 kernel without PAE will still be built (my laptop processor does not have PAE so I am rather interested)? I note that the latest build on Koji has not bui

Re: [PATCH] build a 'full' package on i686

2009-07-20 Thread Bill Nottingham
Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) said: > Oh, I thought that proposal got shot down. The proposal to have the baseline be i686 + SSE2 was shot down; bare i686 was approved. Bill ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www

Re: [PATCH] build a 'full' package on i686

2009-07-20 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:12:06AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) said: > > > +# We only build -PAE on 686. > > > %ifarch i686 > > > -%define with_up 0 > > > %define with_pae 1 > > > %else > > > %define with_pae 0 > > > > The naming of 'with_up'

Re: [PATCH] build a 'full' package on i686

2009-07-20 Thread Bill Nottingham
Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) said: > > +# We only build -PAE on 686. > > %ifarch i686 > > -%define with_up 0 > > %define with_pae 1 > > %else > > %define with_pae 0 > > The naming of 'with_up' is subtle here. With this change, > we'll try building a '686' kernel as well as a '686-PAE

Re: [PATCH] build a 'full' package on i686

2009-07-19 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 01:01:54PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > This is needed for the i686-by-default feature. > > Bill > Index: kernel.spec > === > RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/kernel/devel/kernel.spec,v > retrieving revisi

[PATCH] build a 'full' package on i686

2009-07-17 Thread Bill Nottingham
This is needed for the i686-by-default feature. Bill Index: kernel.spec === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/kernel/devel/kernel.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1634 diff -u -r1.1634 kernel.spec --- kernel.spec 17 Jul 2009 02:07:24 -