Chuck Ebbert wrote:
release that for FC5/FC6. The work is already done.
In the meantime I've started collecting fixes for 2.6.21 and I think it will
be at least decent after a 40-patch or so update (not just a small two
patch update like 2.6.21.1.)
ok than push a 2.6.20.X based one and wait a
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
> Well, getting a quite stable and working-on-lots-of-machines kernel on
> the install media of F7 is also quite important imho.
>
> /me votes for what davej suggested: "do a rebase to .21 this week, and
> push that out to testing, and if anything critical turns up befo
Chuck Ebbert schrieb:
> Dave Jones wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 06:36:32PM +0200, dragoran wrote:
>> > 2.6.21.1 is out ... so whats the plan now? Relase a FC6
>> > update(updates-testing) or stick with 2.6.20.x until 2.6.22 is
>> > out/2.6.21 get some more testing?
>>
>> We could do a reb
Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 06:36:32PM +0200, dragoran wrote:
> > 2.6.21.1 is out ... so whats the plan now? Relase a FC6
> > update(updates-testing) or stick with 2.6.20.x until 2.6.22 is
> > out/2.6.21 get some more testing?
>
> We could do a rebase to .21 this week, and pus
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:04:28PM +0200, dragoran wrote:
> > Most of the scary stuff (new libata pata drivers etc), we'd keep off,
> > so things shouldn't be too bad. The timer changes for tickless are
> > probably the only remaining scary thing. For that we have a few choices.
> > - Leave N
Dave Jones wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 06:36:32PM +0200, dragoran wrote:
> 2.6.21.1 is out ... so whats the plan now? Relase a FC6
> update(updates-testing) or stick with 2.6.20.x until 2.6.22 is
> out/2.6.21 get some more testing?
We could do a rebase to .21 this week, and push that ou
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 08:30:02PM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:55:15 -0500, Jay Cliburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What about MSI? On or off?
>
> Off for FC6, on for Rawhide, or at least this is how I understood
> DaveJ's preference.
I did the same thing in r
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:55:15 -0500, Jay Cliburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about MSI? On or off?
Off for FC6, on for Rawhide, or at least this is how I understood
DaveJ's preference. Considering how unstable it is, makes sense, I guess.
I have a laptop (Dell 1501), where MSI is DOA. Very
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 04:55:15PM -0500, Jay Cliburn wrote:
> > Early preview of F7 features, saves power yadayada, may find new
> > bugs. (Gets us that nice fuzzy 'f6 bugs are f7 bugs' bonus though)
> > - Turn NO_HZ on, but do the same as we did for MSI (enable the config,
> > but only
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:57:49 -0400
Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We could do a rebase to .21 this week, and push that out to testing,
> and if anything critical turns up before that becomes deemed stable,
> we could push a branched build off of .20 directly to updates.
>
> Most of the s
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 06:36:32PM +0200, dragoran wrote:
> 2.6.21.1 is out ... so whats the plan now? Relase a FC6
> update(updates-testing) or stick with 2.6.20.x until 2.6.22 is
> out/2.6.21 get some more testing?
We could do a rebase to .21 this week, and push that out to testing,
and if
2.6.21.1 is out ... so whats the plan now? Relase a FC6
update(updates-testing) or stick with 2.6.20.x until 2.6.22 is
out/2.6.21 get some more testing?
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/l
On 19/04/07, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 03:11:42PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:52:47PM +0100, Chris Brown wrote:
>
> > If I want to test the latest and greatest I've always used your
> > people.redhat.com/davej ftp.
>
> At one point
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 03:11:42PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:52:47PM +0100, Chris Brown wrote:
>
> > If I want to test the latest and greatest I've always used your
> > people.redhat.com/davej ftp.
>
> At one point I had a cronjob that would sync the latest I'd
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:52:47PM +0100, Chris Brown wrote:
> If I want to test the latest and greatest I've always used your
> people.redhat.com/davej ftp.
At one point I had a cronjob that would sync the latest I'd built
through the buildsys there, but it broke when we migrated to a newer
bu
On 19/04/07, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:08:29PM +0100, Chris Brown wrote:
> > On 18.04.2007 23:23, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 01:47:55PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > > > I'd say let F7 testing iron out 2.6.21 for a while before
deci
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:08:29PM +0100, Chris Brown wrote:
> > On 18.04.2007 23:23, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 01:47:55PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > > > I'd say let F7 testing iron out 2.6.21 for a while before deciding
> > about
> > > > FC6. We should be in the
On 18.04.2007 23:23, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 01:47:55PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I'd say let F7 testing iron out 2.6.21 for a while before deciding
about
> > FC6. We should be in the part of freeze where serious Fedora weenies
are
> > doing a lot of testing.
> Getti
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 17:23 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 01:47:55PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I'd say let F7 testing iron out 2.6.21 for a while before deciding about
> > FC6. We should be in the part of freeze where serious Fedora weenies are
> > doing a lot of tes
On 18.04.2007 23:23, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 01:47:55PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I'd say let F7 testing iron out 2.6.21 for a while before deciding about
> FC6. We should be in the part of freeze where serious Fedora weenies are
> doing a lot of testing.
Getting 2.6.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 01:47:55PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I'd say let F7 testing iron out 2.6.21 for a while before deciding about
> FC6. We should be in the part of freeze where serious Fedora weenies are
> doing a lot of testing.
Getting 2.6.21 into FC6 does also have the additional
I'd say let F7 testing iron out 2.6.21 for a while before deciding about
FC6. We should be in the part of freeze where serious Fedora weenies are
doing a lot of testing.
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redha
The number of bugs reported against the FC6 kernel is now dropping.
Should we move to kernel 2.6.21 and risk a whole new wave of bug reports,
or leave it on 2.6.20 and live with the fact that some things can't/won't
be fixed right, like support for PCI message signaled interrupts?
___
23 matches
Mail list logo
