On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 13:15 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Jon Masters wrote:
> > Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 16:16 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> >>> Apparently the qlogic drivers don't have any firmware included in FC7,
> >>> so nobody can actually use a qlogic adapter. Should we be
Jon Masters wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 16:16 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>>> Apparently the qlogic drivers don't have any firmware included in FC7,
>>> so nobody can actually use a qlogic adapter. Should we be patching the
>>> kernel like in FC6 or do we need a separate pack
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 16:16 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Apparently the qlogic drivers don't have any firmware included in FC7,
so nobody can actually use a qlogic adapter. Should we be patching the
kernel like in FC6 or do we need a separate package? Or maybe the
firmware goes i
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Apparently the qlogic drivers don't have any firmware included in FC7,
so nobody can actually use a qlogic adapter. Should we be patching the
kernel like in FC6 or do we need a separate package? Or maybe the
firmware goes in the kernel package?
I personally prefer for it to
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 16:16 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Apparently the qlogic drivers don't have any firmware included in FC7,
> so nobody can actually use a qlogic adapter. Should we be patching the
> kernel like in FC6 or do we need a separate package? Or maybe the
> firmware goes in the kernel
Apparently the qlogic drivers don't have any firmware included in FC7,
so nobody can actually use a qlogic adapter. Should we be patching the
kernel like in FC6 or do we need a separate package? Or maybe the
firmware goes in the kernel package?
Peter says the support for Anaconda / mkinitrd to loa
