On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 11:56 +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Jon Masters wrote:
This works fine, but means that, if we upgrade module-init-tools and
there is a binary format change, then the system will be slow booting
before depmod has been re-run again. I'm thinking about just doing a
depmod
Jon Masters (j...@redhat.com) said:
This works fine, but means that, if we upgrade module-init-tools and
there is a binary format change, then the system will be slow booting
before depmod has been re-run again. I'm thinking about just doing a
depmod -a on upgrade in such cases in the
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 09:52 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jon Masters (j...@redhat.com) said:
This works fine, but means that, if we upgrade module-init-tools and
there is a binary format change, then the system will be slow booting
before depmod has been re-run again. I'm thinking about
Jon Masters wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 18:19 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 03:47 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
I'm considering pushing an update to F-9 since v3.5+ is so much faster
than previous releases - and it impacts boot time, but I have to admit
that I was more
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 18:19 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 03:47 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
I'm considering pushing an update to F-9 since v3.5+ is so much faster
than previous releases - and it impacts boot time, but I have to admit
that I was more concerned about F10 and
