On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 05:05:33PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
John W. Linville wrote:
I still think that for continuity's sake f8 and f9 should continue
to get wireless fixes from 2.6.27. Those should only be specific
bug fixes (although I suppose there is still time for a new driver),
so
John W. Linville wrote:
I still think that for continuity's sake f8 and f9 should continue
to get wireless fixes from 2.6.27. Those should only be specific
bug fixes (although I suppose there is still time for a new driver),
so hopefully the nattering nabobs won't be opposed to continuing with
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 05:05:33PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
John W. Linville wrote:
I still think that for continuity's sake f8 and f9 should continue
to get wireless fixes from 2.6.27. Those should only be specific
bug fixes (although I suppose there is still time for a new driver),
so
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 11:37:10AM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
So, here is what I propose:
-- continue the current practice until 2.6.26 is released and the
2.6.27 merge window closes;
-- after that, continue the current practice for updating rawhide; but,
-- once F9 (and presumably
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 02:56:30PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
John (CCed), I really appreciate your work in the wireless area and
would like to use the opportunity to say thanks for all you work, as
support for WLAN hardware in the Linux kernel improved a lot in the
upstream kernel
Hi all
John (CCed), I really appreciate your work in the wireless area and
would like to use the opportunity to say thanks for all you work, as
support for WLAN hardware in the Linux kernel improved a lot in the
upstream kernel and Fedora thx to your (and other linux wireless
developers)
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- a karama of +3 in bodhi seems not enough for a auto-move from testing to
stable (or even worse: straight to stable if enough people tested the kernel
and gave their +1 after the update got filed in bodhi but *before*
On 05.07.2008 15:54, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- a karama of +3 in bodhi seems not enough for a auto-move from testing to
stable (or even worse: straight to stable if enough people tested the kernel
and gave their +1 after the
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05.07.2008 15:54, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- a karama of +3 in bodhi seems not enough for a auto-move from testing
to
stable (or even worse:
On 05.07.2008 17:22, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05.07.2008 15:54, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- a karama of +3 in bodhi seems not enough for a auto-move from
10 matches
Mail list logo
