On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:47:34PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Axel Thimm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > These patches:
> > >
> > > a) aren't upstream
> > > b) change the format of /proc/stat
> > > c) change process accounting in an incompatible way
> > >
> > > So... no.
> >
> > OK, fair e
Axel Thimm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > These patches:
> >
> > a) aren't upstream
> > b) change the format of /proc/stat
> > c) change process accounting in an incompatible way
> >
> > So... no.
>
> OK, fair enough (I wasn't aware of b) and c)).
>
> Any other way then to achive the stated goa
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:43:32PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Axel Thimm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > Would it make sense to add these patches to Fedora's kernel?
> >
> > http://www.atcomputing.nl/Tools/atop
> >
> > This could help in the ar
Axel Thimm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Would it make sense to add these patches to Fedora's kernel?
>
> http://www.atcomputing.nl/Tools/atop
>
> This could help in the area of extending laptop battery life by
> detecting unneccessary disk access. The first step is to
Would it make sense to add these patches to Fedora's kernel?
http://www.atcomputing.nl/Tools/atop
This could help in the area of extending laptop battery life by
detecting unneccessary disk access. The first step is to have some
disk I/O to process mapping.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpm
